|
The Beliefs of Khomeni the Leader of the Iranian Revolution
[Wilayatul Faqih is the Islamic jurist's right to overrule a ruling that contradicts Islamic law.]
“Those people who, in their envy to rule, attached themselves to the Deen of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and formed their own cliques could not possibly refrain from their actions on the bases of Quranic advice. They had to materialise their aims at any cost.” (Kashful Asraar: 114)
‘Those who had no affiliation with the Quran and Islam except through their desire for the world and power. They had made the Qurun a vehicle to promote their agenda. (Ibid)
He has then continued to write a chapter on how to answer the critiques of the Ahlus Sunnah W’al Jama’ah with the heading: “An eye on the answers of the foolish.” (Ibid: 120)
“We worship and recognise only that God Whose actions are based on concrete rationalism and Who does not rule against that rationalism. We do not worship a god who creates a building for Divine worship and justice and then strives to destroy that very building himself by giving authority to rascals like Yazid, Mu’awiyah and Uthman”. (Ibid: 107) These are but a few selected views of Majlisi, Maqbool Dehlavi, Noori and Allamah Khomeini, the leader of the Iranian Revolution. These have been presented to you without any critique or commentary. The reader should.judge for himself how much he can accept these beliefs. The reader should also ask himself if the rise of Khomeini in Iran was a political revolution or whether he had an agenda to propagate the Shi’ite beliefs. Or whether it was a challenge to all of the Muslim world, or a threat to the bonafides of the beliefs of Sunnis. KHOMEINI’S DECLARATION “The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places Is an essential requirement … when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (Abu Bakr and Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet’s grave.” (Ayatullah Khomeini of Iran, while addressing a message for a youth rally). This statement mirrors the attitude of hatred and contempt which Khomeini and his Shiahs cherish in particular for Ameerul Mu’mineen Sayyidina Abu Bakr and Ameerul Mu’mineen Sayyidina Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma), and about all the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) in general. While this is the vile and abominable attitude of Khomeini towards the illustrious Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Qur’an-e-Kareem states the attitude of Imaan in the following words: “Muhammad is the Rasool of Allah, and those who are with him (i. e. the Sahabah) are stern against the kuffar and tender among themselves. You will see them (the Sahabah) in Ruku’ and Sajdah searching for the grace of Allah and (His) Pleasure. Their sign is on their faces because of the impression of (abundance of) Sajdah… “ (Surah Fath). Most certainly, Allah was well pleased with the Mu’mineen (i.e. the Sahabah) when they took the oath of allegiance to you (0 Muhammad!) under the tree… (Surah Fath) “And the early ones, the first one among the Muhajireen and Ansar and those who follow them (the Muhajireen and Ansar) in virtue, Allah is well pleased with them and they are well pleased with Him. Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which flow rivers; therein will they dwell forever. Indeed, that is the great victory. ” (SurahTaubah) This is what the Qur’an says regarding the Sahabah, but the Shiah priests brand the Muhajireen and Ansar as kafir, murtad and munafiq! Nauthubillah! And, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said about the Sahabah: “Fear Allah! Fear Allah regarding my Sahabah. Thus, whoever loves them, does so because of my love; whoever hates them, does so because of my hatred.” It is thus abundantly clear that Khomeini cherishes a dislike, an aversion, a hatred for the Sahabah because of his hatred for Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The closer a Sahaabi was to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the viler the abuse and the greater the enmity the Shiahs demonstrate for him. The noble Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) are the foundation and the pivots of Islam. The entire basis and superstructure of Islam have been magnificently raised on the teachings, explanations and expositions of the Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum). The Qur’an Majeed itself has been authentically and authoritatively transmitted to the Ummah down the centuries in the form presented by the illustrious Sahabah - by Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthmaan (Radiallahu Anhum), the prime targets of Shi’i and Khomeini vituperation. An abundance of Shi’i propaganda on the instructions of Khomeini is being churned out by Iran. Such propaganda conducted under hollow and hypocritical slogans such as (There is no Shi’ism and no Sunnism), is designed to mislead the Ummah of Islam into acceptance of the Shi’i religion. Ignorance of what Shi’ism is, has constrained many Muslims to incline towards Khomeini and Shi’ism. But, it shall, Insha Allah, be shown To open the eyes of the Sunni brethren of ours, who have been deceived by Khomeini’s propaganda machinery, we shall present here the views of the Shi’i religion - views and statements extracted from the authoritative books of theology of the Shi’i Khomeini’s ‘goats’ more superior to the Sahabah: Trying to instill a sense of inferiority in others in order to highlight the virtues of another, a technique called ‘example by debasement,’ is a tendency of many. Whilst some do this to maybe, through invoking jealousy, get a truant brother to follow in the footsteps of his bigger more well-behaved brother, the Shi’ahs do this in order to claim their place (if any) amongst the Muslims of the world. By doing so, the virtues of those who are compared is lost, their good points too, lose all appeal, and all focus and excellence is shifted to the one who is compared to. “Today, the volunteers wanting to go to the battlefields embrace martyrdom in such a whole-hearted way that this was unprecedented even during the period of the Prophet Muhammad and Hazrat ‘Ali. It is mentioned in Qur’aan that when the Prophet used to invite people to war, they did not obey and were providing excuses to postpone the event for another day, or talked of either cold or hot weather.” (Tehran Times, vol III no: 222, March 11, 1982) If the Sahabah did not support the Holy Prophet (SAW) in his campaigns, how it is that when Sayyidina ‘Ali came to power, he found a kingdom stretching from Madinah as far as Jerusalem to the west, Azerbaijan tot he East, and practically the whole of north Africa at his feet? Khomeni’s View Of The Sahabah: In his book, Kashful Asrar, on page 115 Khomeini accuses Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhuma) of having opposed the clear texts of the Qur’an. Thus he says: “We shall present a few examples of Abu Bakr and Umar having opposed the explicit laws of the Quran and deciding against it. The general body of the Muslims accept their decisions (which were in conflict with the Quran). “ On page 119 of his book, Khomeini openly brands Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) as a kafir and zindeeq. Khomeini states: “From the examples of Abu Bakr’s and Umar’s opposition to the Qur’an, cited by us, it is clear that contradicting the Quran publicly and adopting actions in violation of the Quran were not regarded as a serious matter by these two. The Muslims of that time (viz. the Sahabah) either joined their (Abu Bakr’s and Umar’s) party in the quest for Political leadership which was their goal, or if they did not join their Party because of not fully supporting them, they never said a word in opposition to those unjust oppressors and powerful munafiqs (referring to Hadhrat’s Abu Bakr and Umar). They lacked the courage for this… Abu Bakr who had plotted the whole conspiracy would have fabricated a hadith in contradiction to the Quran just as he had done for depriving Hadhrat Fatimah of her share of inheritance in the estate of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). And Umar - it is entirely to be expected that he would have said that either Allah Himself erred in revealing this ayat or Jibraeel or Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) erred in its delivery. At that time Sunnis would also have supported him and would have aided him in opposition to the command of Allah … just as is their These are the claims and allegations of Khomeini who vociferously and deceitfully, raises the slogan: “There is no Sunni’sm and no Shi’ism.” In the above “tract from his book, Kashful Asrar, it is abundantly clear that Khomeini is echoing the following Shi’i beliefs: *That Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Umar and the entire body of the Sahabah were murtads and munafiqs. * That Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Umar interpolated in the Qur’an, changing and deleting to suit their whims and desires. They fabricated and forged ahadith in conflict with the Qur’an. The logical conclusion emanating from these Shiah beliefs is that the Qur’an which we have with us today is not authentic since it was the compilation of these very Sahabah who are regarded as munafiqs by Shi’ism. Besides this fact stemming as the logical conclusion from Shiah beliefs, the highest books of the Shiah religion categorically assert the falsity of the present Qur’an. Insha’Allah, this claim will be described later. Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu) is a famous name. This illustrious Sahaabi of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is well-known for his copious narration of ahadith. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) made special dua for Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu), but Khomeini has the following to say about this eminent Sahaabi and Muhaddith: “God knows what Misfortunes Islam has Suffered from its inception down to the present at the hands of these evil ‘ulama’. Abu Hurairah was one of the fuqaha, but Allah knows what judgments he falsified for Muaawiya and others like him, and what damage he inflicted upon Islam - But when a faqih like Abu Hurairah or a judge like Shurayh joins such a government, he improves its standing while besmirching the reputation of Islam.” Commenting on this statement of Khomeini, Hamid Algar the compiler of Khomeini’s writings and declarations, states: “Shi’i scholars have regarded him as unreliable and even dishonest.” But, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) made special dua for Abu Hurairah in respect of narration of ahadith, hence we observe the ahadith in abundance narrated by him. The following statement bears out the love which Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had for Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). “O Allah! Endear this, your servant (Abu Hurairah) and his mother to your believing servants and endear the believers to them.” (Muslim) Thus those who are Believers love Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). Those who are unbelievers detest Hadhrat Abu Hurairah (Radiallahu Anhu). Khomeini, slandering the eminent Sahaabi, Hadhrat Samura Bin Jundub (Radiallahu Anhu) says: “Dissemination of the ordinances of Islam, as well as the teaching and instruction of the people, is the duty of the fuqaha who are just. For if they are not just, they will be like those who forged traditions harmful to Islam, like Samura ibn Jandab, who forged traditions hostile to the Commander of the Faithful.”……….. SHIA SLOGAN OF FALSEHOOD: Khomeini’s popular slogan is: “NO SUNNI’ISM AND NO SHI’ISM”. This overt call of the Shi’i priests is designed for the consumption of Sunni Muslims who constitute the Ummah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). However, like numerous verbal professions of the Shi’i priests are based on their doctrine of Taqiyah, so too, is this vociferous slogan of “No Sunni’ism and No Shi’ism.” (Taqiyah is the Shiah doctrine of holy hypocrisy by which it is permissible for them to conceal their true beliefs and profess verbally what they do not believe). How is it possible for there not to be Sunni’ism? And, how is it possible for there not to be Shi’ism? The foundation on which Sunni’ism is reared is Love for the Sahaabah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) while the cornerstone of Shi’ism is Hatred for the Sahaabah. The two religions, viz., Islam and Shi’ism are irreconcilable opposites. The one repels the other. The slogan of Khomeini is nothing other than a piece of political trickery to gain the support of the Ahle Sunnah for the fulfillment of his despicable motives of political power. A group which pours out such extreme hatred for the Sahaabah of Nabi-e-Kareem (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as the Shiah sect, can never stand on the same platform as those whose article of faith includes Love and respect for all the Sahaabah. Shiahs who proclaim that the highest among the Sahaabah were murtads and kafirs can never themselves be Muslims. Such vile claimants can never be the friends of those who follow the Path of the Sunnah, the Path of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the illustrious Sahaabah. Khomeini stated in a message for a youth rally: “The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places is an essential requirement … when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (i.e. Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet’s grave.” (Khomeinism and Islam-by Abu Rehan Farooqi). This attitude of Khomeini is not only his personal belief and personal hatred for the greatest ‘Sahaabah, but it mirrors the belief of Shi’ism regarding Hadhrat Abu Bakr Siddique and Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). In the books of Shi’i theology, the following noxious beliefs are propagated: * When Imaam Mahdi appears, he will order the exhumation of the bodies of Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar. Their bodies will be hung on a tree for public show. Their bodies which even according to Shi’ism have not decomposed, will be stripped of their kafan. Thus, the nude bodies of these noble Sahaabah will be put up for a disgraceful show. * Imaam Mahdi will restore Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar to life. * The sins of entire mankind, right from the inception of the world until the time of Imaam Mahdi’s appearance, collectively devolves on these two noble Sahaabah. Hence, Imaam Mahdi will put them to death. They will then be revived and death will continuously be inflicted on them a thousand times daily, forever and ever. These corrupt and vile allegations are stated in the Shi’i book, Haqqul Yaqeen, the author of which is among the highest Shiah theologians, Mullah Baqir who is also the author of another book Zaadul Ma’aad which likewise contains many vile fabrications about the Sahaabah. In his book, Zaadul Ma’aad, Mullah Baqir asserts that: * Hadhrat Umar, the second Khalifah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), was a kafir. (Nauthubillaah!) Not only a kafir, but the leader of the munaafiqeen. * Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had cursed Hadhrat Umar and had prayed for his destruction. As a result of the la’nat (curse) which Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and Hadhrat Faatimah (Radiallahu Anha) invoked on Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) he was murdered by the kafir Persian, Lu’lu’. * The murderer of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), by virtue of having murdered Hadhrat Umar, deserved the mercy of Allah, hence, Hadhrat Huzaifah (according to Shi’i falsehood) prayed for Allah’s Rahmat to be on the kafir, Lu’lu’, the murderer of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). * The most auspicious day in the year is the day Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was murdered and the virtues and excellencies of this day stem from the murder of Umar. In honor of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi Wasallam) and Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu), Allah Ta’ala annually-grants Shiahs three consecutive days in which they are permitted to sin freely. The Recording Angels are instructed to cease recording sins on these three days commencing on the day Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was murdered. Three free days of sinning are among the ways of rejoicing the murder of Umar (Radiallahu Anhu). * Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) altered the Qur’aan Shareef and prevented others from Islam. These corruption’s as well as many other falsehoods are imputed by the Shiahs to Hadhrat Umar, the man about whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “If after me there had to be a Nabi, It would have been Umar.” “the most resolute in the Law of Allah is Umar”. But, Shi’i priests shout: “No Sunni’ism and No Shi’ism.” Muslims should not allow themselves to be deluded by the slogans of the Shi’i priests. Such slogans are motivated by a lust for political power. In his futile attempts to seek fulfillment of his dreams to rule the World of Islam, Khomeini strives to lure and dupe Sunni Muslims into his camp, for he is fully aware of the fact that minus Sunnis there is no Ummah, no Islam and no Islamic history. All Muslim lands barring Iran, are Sunni lands. Without Shiahs, Islam exists, since Shi’ism is a religion at variance with Islam. But, without Sunnis there is no Islam, for the only true Islam is the Deen followed by the Ahle Sunnah Wal Jama’. Khomeini understands this much, hence he seeks to woo the Ahle Sunnah by means of his hollow and insincere slogans of “No SHI’ISM and no SUNNI’ISM”. But this slogan is raised under cover of the confounded Shiah doctrine of Taqiyah (holy fraud and holy hypocrisy). Khomeini’s Criticism: In an annotation on this statement, Hamid Algar, the compiler of Khomeini’s writings and speeches, says: “The reference here is to certain shortcomings Shias have traditionally perceived in the exercise of rule by Abu Bakr. “ The Shi’i theologian, Tabatabai, accusing Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu) of having greater concern for Zakaat than the institution of Khilafate says: “Surely the problem of the legitimate caliphate was more important and significant than tithes (Zakaat), and Shi’ism believes that the same principle applied by the first caliph to this matter should have been applied by the whole early community to the problem of succession to the Holy Prophet. “ This reflects the Shi’i belief that Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar along with the general body of Sahabah (Radiallahu Anhum) usurped the Khilaafat which according to the religion of the Shias was the inherent and divine right of Hadhrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu). Here the Shi’i priest, Tabatabai accuses Hadhrat Abu Bakr of having denied Hadhrat Ali his legitimate rights. He further alleges that Hadhrat Abu Bakr and the Sahaabah (Radiallahu Anhum) accorded no concern to the question of the appointment of the Khalifah and that they violated the Shariah in installing Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu). The Shi’i belief in regard to the Khilaafat after Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is that the Sahaabah failed in applying the principle of ‘truth and justice’ because they accepted Hadhrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu) as the Khalifah of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). FALSE ALLEGATION: In another crude aspersion cast against the mission of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the Shi’i priest, Baqir Sadr states: “Everything that has gone before Proves that the instruction given by the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to the Muhajirun and the Ansar did not reach a level which would have been necessitated by the conscious, intellectual and political preparation required to guide the future path of the Da’wa and the process of change which had been instigated by the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).”… |
Dragged through streets, Khominee in death
This is the same person who during one of his Juma khutbas said that it his ardent wish that he wanted to drag the body of Hazrat Umer 
(naouzobillah) through the streets 
QUOTE
KHOMEINI‘S DECLARATION”The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places Is an essential requirement … when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (Abu Bakr and Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet’s grave.“(Ayatullah Khomeini of Iran, while addressing a message for a youth rally).
Khomeinism and Islam,
page 8 by Abu Rehan Farooqi
The height of frenzy occurred at the gravesite itself. Bringing the body by land vehicle was out of the question, so it arrived by helicopter. The first time the helicopter landed, the crowd swarmed in and grabbed pieces of the shroud, causing the corpse actually to fall to the ground. After fifteen frantic minutes, the coffin was put back on the helicopter, which then bore the body away. In an attempt to thin out the crowd, it was announced that the funeral had been postponed by a day. The trick worked, as many went home. Then, six hours after the first attempt, a second effort at a helicopter landing was made. This time more guards were around and the body was placed in a metal casket. Still, it was not easy. As the Iranian news agency described it: “The grave was only ten meters away but the pushing and shoving of thousands made it seem like kilometers. It took ten terrible minutes to be able to put the casket down near the grave.” Once the body had finally been buried, concrete blocks were placed on top of it.
Promises of Ayatollahs: On the very day [Ayatollah Ruhollah]Khomeini returned to Iran after exile [in 1979, before he led the Islamic revolution that brought fundamentalist Muslims to power in Iran], he made a speech in Tehran’s main cemetery. In this speech, Khomeini promised free telephone, heating, electricity and bus services.
and Khominee kept his promise, to the resident of the cementery.
Exposing the doomed one (Khomeini), perverted believes and fiqhSome of the sayings of Khomeini.…Especially for those who love to defend him or try to find excuses for this doomed kafir.نسب الخميني إلى علي قوله : كنت مع الأنبياء باطناً ومع رسول الله ظاهراً. مصباح الهداية ص 142 .
Khomeini accredited these words to Ali (ra): “I was present with (all) prophets in elusive form but (my presences) was manifest with Messenger of Allah.”
Misbah Al-Hidayah p.142
ويقول تحت قوله تعالى (( يدبر الأمر يفصل الآيات لعلكم بلقاء ربكم توقنون )) قال : أي ربكم الذي هو الإمام . مصباح الهداية ص 145.
And commenting under the aya (He regulates all affairs, explaining the Ayat in detail, that you may believe with certainty in the meeting with your Lord – Surat Ar-Rad : 2) he (Khomeini) said: Your Lord who is the Imam.
Misbah Al-Hidayah p. 145
ثم ينقل عن أحد أئمته أنه قال : لنا مع الله حالات هو هو ونحن نحن ، وهو نحن ، ونحن هو ) . مصباح الهداية ص 114 .)
He narrates on behave of one of Imams that he said: We have state with Allah, He He and we we, and He is us and we are He.
Misbah Al-Hidayah p. 114
وذكر : أن الفقيه الرافضي بمنزلة موسى و عيسى . الحكومة الإسلامية ص 95
He also mentioned that the position of Rafidah scholars is that of Musa (as) and Isa (as).
Hukumat Al-Islamiyyah p.95
Comment: Example sistani, khomeni, Khoei and the rest of the filthy creatures have the status of mighty messengers of Allah
ويقول أيضا: يمكن أن يقال إن التوسل إلى الموتى وطلب الحاجة منهم شرك ، لأن النبي والإمام ليس إلا جمادين فلا تتوقع منهما النفع والضرر ، والجواب : إن الشرك هو طلب الحاجة من غير الله ، مع الاعتقاد بأن هذا الغير هو إله ورب ، وأما طلب الحاجة من الغير من غير هذا الاعتقاد فذلك ليس بشرك !! ، ولا فرق في هذا المعنى بين الحي والميت ، ولهذا لو طلب أحد حاجته من الحجر والمدر لا يكون شركاً ، مع أنه قد فعل فعلاً باطلاً . ومن ناحية أخرى نحن نستمد من أرواح الأنبياء المقدسة والأئمة الذين أعطاهم الله قدرة . لقد ثبت بالبراهين القطعية والأدلة النقلية المحكمة حياة الروح بعد الموت ، والإحاطة الكاملة للأرواح على هذا العالم . كشف الأسرار ص 30 .
In short he says: It is not Shirk to ask prophets and Imams for your needs unless you believe them to be gods. Likewise, it is not shirk to ask stones for need, even if that action was wrong (it is not shirk).
——————————
Absurdities in Fiqh of Khomeini Taken from the book Tahrir Al-Waseelah Vol. 2 page (from 241 to 291)
ماء الاستنجاء سواء كان من البول أو الغائط طاهر “
Water used in process of cleaning genitals after urination and excrement, is clean if any of its three characteristics are not changed, nor should it contain any significant particles of feces, nor should filth exceed in a way that is unbelievable with (the act of) istinja…
http://www.wilayah.ir/ar/library/books/tahrir/tahrir11.php
صلاة الجنازة تصح من الجنب “
Funeral prayer is accept even if one is on Janaba (state of person after sexual intercourse)
المشهور و الأقوى جواز وطء الزوجة دبرا ” يعني اللواط بها .
The well-known and strongest saying is the permissibility of having sexual intercourse with ones wife from rare, i.e. sodomizing her.
لا يجوز وطء الزوجة قبل اكمال تسع سنين ، و أما سائر الايمتاعات كاللمس بشهوة و الضم و التفخيذ فلا باس بها حتى في الرضيعة “
It is impermissible to have intercourse with ones wife before she reaches 9 years, and as for as all other enjoyments like touching with sexual desire, hugging and placing your private part in-between her thighs, then there is nothing wrong with that, even if it is done with an infant.
لا يجوز نكاح بنت الأخ على العمة و بنت الأخت على الخالة إلا بإذنهما . و يجوز نكاح العمة و الخالة على بنتي الأخ و الأخت “
It is impermissible for nieces to marry their uncles (husband of their aunties) except after the consent of aunties. But it is permissible for aunties to marry husbands of their nieces without their consent (consent of nieces).
http://www.wilayah.ir/ar/library/books/tahrir/tahrir26.php
في المتعة : ” يجوز التمتع في الزانية ” ، ” يجوز ان يشترط عليها و عليه الاتيان ليلا أو نهارا و أن يشترط المرة والمرات مع تعيين المدة بالزمان
Mut’ah is permissible with prostitutes, it is permissible for a man to lay down conditions for approaching her in day or night, also laying conditions for the number of times with its length (time period of Mut’ah –i.e. for a day, week, year etc) .
Angel Jebrael (as) speaks words of Kufr!
As we know the hatred of rafidah against Jabrael (as) because they say that Allah sent him to Ali (ra) to convey him prophethood but instead he went to Muhammad 
.
Now lets see how they invent lies on this Great Angel.
The cursed khomeini says in one of his book that…
…Jebrael in his initial creation was asked by Allah more than ones who am I and who are you?! He answered every time directing his speech to Allah with the phrase: “You are you and I am I am I, so he was burned because of arrogance, and felt from near by heaven, further in distance which is between this earth and that heaven, till when the saviour of souls in the world of lights and devils, Mula of this universe, and Imam of Human and Jinns our leader Ali Alaihi Salam appeared, and taught him to say in answer: “Your the Lord the most Honourable and I am Humble slave Jebrael. And when he said those words he was saved from distant hell fire and Separation.
Let us expose him even more.
Book Hukuma Al-Islamiyya by ayatul shytan khomeini
“Verily, the Imaam has a praised station, a supreme rank and universal sovereignty to which authority and command submit all the atoms of this universe. And of the imperatives of our religion is that our Imaams occupy a praised station which is accessible by neither a close angel nor a sent prophet …
Their Imam’s are higher than Angels and Messengers in rank.
Their (majosi) scholars are equal to the best messengers of Allah.
What will be next by this filthy creature? Of course his majosi followers. So let see what did he say regarding them.
“I daringly claim that the people of Iran with its masses of million at our present time are better than the people of *Hijaaz (referring to sahaba) who were present at time of Messenger of Allah…”
*Hijaaz is area covering Medina, Mecca and Jeddah.
VIEWS OF KHOMEINI FROM HIS BOOK, “KASHFUL ASRAR”
“From the examples I (Khomeini) have given, it shows that the Sheiks Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) and Umar (radi Allahu anhu) had acted against the Quran. For these people to behave in such a manner amongst the Muslims was not surprising. The Muslims (Sahaba-e-Kiraam) were also in such a state that they were either part of the same group (Abu Bakr - radi Allahu anhu - and Umar -radi Allahu anhu) or they had similar intentions of becoming the government in power.
“If they (the Muslims) did not side them (Abu Bakr - radi Allahu anhu - and Umar - radi Allahu anhu ) then it was certain that they did not have the courage to speak out against those who behaved badly towards Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and his beloved daughter (Fathima - radi Allahu anha).
“In short, even if mention was made in the Quran in clear words on this matter (The succession of Ali - radi Allahu anhu - as Caliph), they would not have changed their intentions, and even at the Command of Allah they would not have given up the seat (of Government).
“Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), who had harboured pre-meditated plans, if anything, would have falsely forged a Hadith to put an end to this matter, just as he had done so to prevent Hazrat Fathima (radi Allahu anha) from receiving her inheritance. And it was not impossible for Umar (radi Allahu anhu) in the matter regarding the Imaamat and Khilaafat of Ali (radi Allahu anhu) to negate such a verse (regarding the Khilaafat of Ali - radi Allahu anhu) either by saying that there was a mistake in Allah’s Revelation of the Ayah, or that Gibraeel had erred in transmitting (Allah’s Message) correctly to Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam).”
(KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGES 119-120)
KHOMEINI ON QURAN IN HIS “KASHFUL ASRAR”
“TAHREEF (deliberate alteration of words to change the meaning of the holy books, namely, the Bible, etc.) is that fault which Muslims accuse Jews and Christians of indulging in, has proved to be found in the Ashaabs (of Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam).”
(KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGE 114)
“It was easy for the Ashaabs (of Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) to remove verses from the Holy Quran and deliberately add verses to it, and in this way forever concealing from the people of the world the true Quran.”
(KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGE 114)
Yes, the above shocking statements are in Khomeini’s book. Yet, it is the firm belief of the Muslims that the Holy Quran is the direct Word of Almighty Allah. The Holy Quran has been protected from any type of changes, removals and additions of verses or increase in volume, by Almighty Allah Himself.
But, in the corrupt Shia propagation of Islam, the present day Quran is accepted as a changed version like the Tauraat and the Bible. And according to Mr. Khomeini, the Sahaba-i-Kiraam of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) had prevented the entire world from gaining access to the original Quran. MA’AAZALLAH! Allah forbid!
The Shia’ite belief on the Quran even insults the glorious Khulafa-e-Rashideen, whose names are mentioned from the mimbars of every Masjid in the Khutbah in every Jummah; those two Khulafa (Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Umar) who are resting alongside of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) under the Green Dome; and those upon whom thousands of Muslims around the world send their Tribute and Salaams.
Sayyiduna Ali (radi Allahu anhu) himself makes mention of the great service that Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Siddique (radi Allahu anhu) had provided to the Holy Quran. In the introduction of “FATHUL BARI” and “KANZUL A’MAL” appears a narration of Ibne Mubarak that Hazrat Ali (radi Allahu anhu) stated that:
“In the service (compilation) of heavenly books (MASAAHIF), Hazrat Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) would receive the greatest reward. May Allah’s Mercy be on Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu). He was the first person to have started the compilation of the Holy Quran (Kitabullah).”
:
red marked: Issue # 11
The well-known and strongest saying is the permissibility of having sexual intercourse with ones wife from rare but with extreme hatred. And it’s better to leave such practice specially when she is not willing.
Issue # 12
It is impermissible to have intercourse with ones wife before she reaches 9 years, and as for as all other enjoyments like touching with sexual desire, hugging and placing your private part in-between her thighs, then there is nothing wrong with that, even if it is done with an infant.
——————————————-
A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby However he
should not penetrate, sodomising the child is OK If the man penetrates and
damages the child then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her
life This girl, however does not count as one of his four permanent wives
The man will not be eligible to marry the girls sister
From Khomeini’s book, “Tahrirolvasyleh”, fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom,
Iran, 1990
A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on
However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm He should not
sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to
the next door village should be fine
From Khomeini’s book, “Tahrirolvasyleh”, fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom,
Iran, 1990
http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahrir/tahrir2d.htm
Under sex change
Issue # 1
Apparently, it is not forbidden to operate on sex change, man to woman and the opposite. Like wise it is not forbidden to operate on bisexual to change him to either of the sexes.
Issue # 8
If a woman changes her sex to man will she become mahram to her son’s wife like father or not? It’s not far away from paradox. And if father changes his sex, will he in state of his womanhood be a mahram to his sons even if he were not in the position to be called their mother? The apparent is like that. And if daughter-in-law changed her sex and became a man will she became mahram for her mother-in-law? It’s not far away from paradox.
http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahrir/tahrir2d.htm
Cursing sahaba and Ummahat Al-Mu’minin (Allah be pleased with them)
The supplication of the Two Idols of Quraysh
“O’ Allah, sal ala Muhamed wa ala aal Muhamed and curse the two idols of Quraysh (Abu Bakr and Omar), its (Quraysh’s) two sorcerers, its two tyrants, its two liars, and their two daughters (Aysha and Hafsah) who (Abu Bakr and Omar) disagreed with your order, denied your revelation, rejected your goodness, disobeyed your messenger, altered your religion, tampered (harafa) with your Book (Al-Quran), loved your enemy, rejected your lovers, suspended your verdicts, invalidated your orders, did not believe in your proves, antagonized your lovers, patronized your foes, ruined your country, and corrupted your slaves, O’ Allah curse them both, their followers, their lovers, their people, their adherents, their partisans, their disciples ………….”
Maloon Khomeini approved this cursed supplication in the book called Tuhfat Al-Owam Maqbool.
http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahrir/tahrir26.htmer.
مسألة 4 :
لا يتمتع على العمة ببنت أخيها ، و لا على الخالة ببنت أختها إلا بإذنهما أو إجازتهما ، و كذا لا يجمع بين الاختين .
Issue # 4
It is not permissible for a man to contract mut’ah with nieces (daughter of brother & daughter of sister) of his wife except with their (aunties) consent or permission, and likewise should not combine between two sisters.
“إن الذين لم يكن لهم ارتباط بالإسلام والقرآن إلا لأجل الرئاسة والدنيا ، و كانوا يجعلون القرآن وسيلة لمقاصدهم الفاسدة ، كان من الممكن أن يحرفوا هذا الكتاب السماوي في حالة ذكر اسم الإمام في القرآن و أن يمسحوا هذه الآيات منه و أن يلصقوا وصمة العار هذه على حياة المسلمين“
كشف الأسرار ( ص 114 ).
Those (referring to sahaba) who had no attachment with Islam and Qur’an except for sake of Leadership and the World, and used to make Qur’an a means for their corrupt goals, it was possible for them to alter this Heavenly Book (Qur’an) whenever the name of Imam in Qur’an was mentioned, and erase those verses and attach stigma and shame on the lives of muslims.
(Kashful Asrar Page 114)
ويقول أيضاً في خطاب ألقاه في ذكرى مولد الرضا الإمام السابع عند الشيعة بتاريخ 9/8/1984م ” إني متأسف لأمرين: أحدهما أن نظام الحكم الإسلامي لم ينجح منذ فجر الإسلام إلى يومنا هذا ، وحتى في عهد الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم ولم يستقم نظام الحكم كما ينبغي “
The maloon khomeini was sorry in his speech on commemoration of Imam Redha’s birthday - the 7th imam of shias - dated 9/8/1984. “I am sorry for two things: One of them is that system of Islamic government did not succeed since the dawn of Islam to our present day. Even in the time of Messenger of Allah the system of government was not established as it should have been.
و يقول الخميني :عن خرافتهم ’’الغائب المنتظر‘‘ : “” لقد جاء الأنبياء جميعاً من أجل إرساء قواعد العدالة لكنهم لم ينجحوا حتى النبي محمد خاتم الأنبياء الذي جاء لإصلاح البشرية .. لم ينجح في ذلك و إن الشخص الذي سينجح في ذلك هو المهدي المنتظر “” . من خطاب ألقاه الخميني بمناسبة ذكرى مولد المهدي في 15 شعبان 1400 هـ .
“All prophets came for the purpose of laying down the foundation of justice in the world, but they failed to do so; even Prophet Muhammad, the last of the Prophets who came to reform mankind and to apply justice failed too. The person who will succeed in all this and in laying down the foundation of justice in the world at all levels, and redressing the wrong is the expected mahdi…”
commemoration of Imam mehdi’s birthday on 15 sha’ban 1400 hijri
Khomeini reviling the two shaikhs and imputing to them disbelief and apostasy, and accusing them of violating the Qur’aan willfully and ignorantly, and imputing to them foolishness and tyranny
“We are not dealing, at this point, with the two shaikhs, or with whatever violations they committed against the Qur’aan, tampered with the commands of Allaah, declared things lawful and things unlawful on their own accord, practiced oppression against Fatimah, the daughter of the Prophet and her sons. But we want to point out their ignorance of the commands of Allaah and the religion. People like those ignorant fools, hobos and tyrants were not fit to be in the office of Imamate, nor to be included among the people of authority.”
[Khomeini, Kashf al-Asrar, pp. 107, 108.]
The liar further asserts: “It is quite obvious from all that has preceded that the violations of the two shaikhs against the Qur’aan were not of great importance to the Muslims. That is because they were either in the party of the two shaikhs and supportive of them or against them, but did not dare to say a thing to those who treated the Messenger of Allaah and his daughter the way they did. Even if one of the opposition was to say something, his words would pass unattended to, even if these issues were mentioned in the Qur’aan. Those two would not have refrained from their way, nor would have they abdicated their office.”
[ibid, pp. 116. 33]
Also the zindiq khomeini says: “The actions of Umar issued forth from disbelief and heresies and the violations of verse mentioned in the Qur’aan.”
[ibid, pp. 117. 34 ]
“We worship and recognise only that God Whose actions are based on concrete rationalism and Who does not rule against that rationalism. We do not worship a god who creates a building for Divine worship and justice and then strives to destroy that very building himself by hands of amirs like Yazid, Mu’awiyah and Uthman”.
It’s a book written by Ex-Shia Scholar, a highly educated and respected Scholar who was a close student of Khomeni (Laeen).
As we all know the shias are very secretive in nature cause of the filth they have.
They have fabricated a lot of hadiths to keep their members alert and never leak any information from their religion that will damage their foundation. For example this Hadith which says “You belong to a religion that whosoever conceals it Allah will honor him; whoever reveals it Allah will disgrace and humiliate him”
But if someone is Guided? Then what will be the case? Will he keep his Ex-religion’s teaching in secret? No.
SO IF HE OPENS HIS MOUTH THEN WHAT?
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS…READ.
“Ahaadeeths” from the sixth Shi’ia Imaam, Ja`faar as-Sadiq,
“One who exposes something from our religion is like one who intentionally kills us. “
YES HE KILL THEM,
This is exactly what Sayed Hussain Al-Musawi did. He exposed shia religion completely.
Example of content of this book which can be found in Arabic. Check the following link (Book on Shia religion) if you can translate by web sites which offer translation of Arabic to English it good, but please give it to someone who (who knows Arabic & English) can make minor correction in translation cause you know computer is not perfect.
Brothers I read the whole book 2 years back it man I just have no words to say or what or where to start from. The web site in English contains just half of what this book contains.
Here is a translated version of its contain (by me). Sorry if there are mistakes. I wish I could translate the whole book.
ORIGINAL
لما كان الإمام الخميني مقيماً في العراق كنا نتردد إليه ونطلب منه العلم حتى صارت علاقتنا معه وثيقة جداً، وقد اتفق مرة أن وجهت إليه دعوة من مدينة تلعفر وهي
مدينة تقع غرب الموصل على مسيرة ساعة ونصف تقريباً بالسيارة، فطلبني للسفر معه فسافرت معه، فاستقبلونا وأكرمونا غاية الكرم مدة بقائنا عند إحدى العوائل الشيعية المقيمة هناك، وقد قطعوا عهداً بنشر التشيع في تلك الأرجاء وما زالوا يحتفظون بصورة تذكارية لنا تم تصويرها في دارهم.
ولما انتهت مدة السفر رجعنا، وفي طريق عودتنا ومرورنا في بغداد أراد الإمام أن نرتاح من عناء السفر، فأمر بالتوجه إلى منطقة العطيفية حيث يسكن هناك رجل إيراني الأصل يقال له سيد صاحب، كانت بينه وبين الإمام معرفة قوية.
فرح سيد صاحب بمجيئنا، وكان وصولنا إليه عند الظهر، فصنع لنا غداء فاخراً واتصل ببعض أقاربه فحضروا وازدحم منـزله احتفاء بنا، وطلب سيد صاحب إلينا المبيت عنده تلك الليلة فوافق الإمام، ثم لما كان العشاء أتونا بالعشاء، وكان الحاضرون يقبلون يد الإمام ويسألونه ويجيب عن أسئلتهم، ولما حان وقت النوم وكان الحاضرون قد انصرفوا إلا أهل الدار، أبصر الإمام الخميني صبية بعمر أربع سنوات أو خمس ولكنها جميلة جداً، فطلب الإمام من أبيها سيد صاحب إحضارها للتمتع بـها فوافق أبوها بفرح بالغ، فبات الإمام الخميني والصبية في حضنه ونحن نسمع بكاءها وصريخها.
المهم أنه أمضى تلك الليلة فلما أصبح الصباح وجلسنا لتناول الإفطار نظر إلي فوجد علامات الإنكار واضحة في وجهي؛ إذ كيف يتمتع بـهذه الطفلة الصغيرة وفي الدار شابات بالغات راشدات كان بإمكانه التمتع بإحداهن فلم يفعل؟
فقال لي: سيد حسين ما تقول في التمتع بالطفلة؟
قلت له: سيد القول قولك، والصواب فعلك، وأنت إمام مجتهد، ولا يمكن لمثلي أن يرى أو يقول إلا ما تراه أنت أو تقوله، -ومعلوم أني لا يمكنني الاعتراض وقتذاك-.
فقال: سيد حسين؛ إن التمتع بـها جائز ولكن بالمداعبة والتقبيل والتفخيذ.
أما الجماع فإنـها لا تقوى عليه.
وكان الإمام الخميني يرى جواز التمتع حتى بالرضيعة فقال: (لا بأس بالتمتع بالرضيعة ضماً وتفخيذاً -أي يضع ذكره بين فخذيها- وتقبيلاً) انظر كتابه (تحرير الوسيلة 2/241 مسألة رقم 12).
TRANSLATED
“When Khomeini was staying in Iraq, we used to visit him daily asking for knowledge until our relationship grew stronger. And once Khomeini received an invitation from a far away place and asked me to join him in his journey and I agreed. When we reached there they received us with a very warm welcome and then on our way back the Imam (Laeen Khomeini) said that we will stop in Baghdad and order us to head towards a place called ‘Etaifeya’ [sorry if the spelling is wrong] where an Iranian man stayed, whose name was Sayed Saheb. This man and Khomeini had a strong friendly relation. The man was very happy with this surprise visit by Khomeini. The time was mid afternoon and the man prepared launch and telephoned some of his close relatives. The house was full of people who came to see Khomeini. The man asked Khomeini to spend the night with him, and Khomeini agreed. And when it was time for dinner they came to us with the dinner and all of them were kissing the hand of Khomeini and asking him questions. And when it was time to sleep all the people left except the people of the house i.e. family of Sayed Saheb. Khomeini saw a small girl, daughter of Sayed Saheb whose age was just four years and she was very pretty. Khomeini asked Sayed Saheb to bring her to his room for mut’ah ignoring the fact that there were big girls in the house. To my surprise the father agreed with over whelming joy on his face. Khomeini took away the girl to his room and all that night we could hear the awful cry of that small child from the room. And when it was morning we all sat on the table to have breakfast. Khomeini could clearly see signs of disagreement on my face of what took place the last night. He then asked me “O! Sayed Hussain what do you say about mut’ah with a child?” I said “O! Imam the answer will be your answer and I am just a student (as I could not openly criticize him at that time). Khomeini then answered that it is okay to have mut’ah with small child but one can only play with her by touching her private parts and kissing and putting his private part in-between her thighs but should be careful not to put it in the vagina as they cannot withstand that.
Khomeni also used to believe in Mut’ah with an INFANT”
ORIGINAL
جاءتني امرأة تستفسر مني عن حادثة حصلت معها، إذ أخبرتني أن أحد السادة وهو السيد حسين الصدر كان قد تمتع بـها قبل أكثر من عشرين سنة فحملت منه، فلما أشبع رغبته منها فارقها، وبعد مدة رزقت ببنت، وأقسمت أنـها حملت منه هو إذ لم يتمتع بـها وقتذاك أحد غيره.
وبعد أن كبرت البنت وصارت شابة جميلة متأهلة للزواج، اكتشفت الأم أن ابنتها حبلى، فلما سألتها عن سبب حملها، أخبرتـها البنت أن السيد المذكور استمتع بـها فحملت منه، فدهشت الأم وفقدت صوابـها، إذ أخبرت ابنتها أن هذا السيد هو أبوها وأخبرتـها القصة، فكيف يتمتع بالأم واليوم يأتي ليتمتع بابنتها التي هي ابنته هو؟
ثم جاءتني مستفسرة عن موقف السيد المذكور منها ومن ابنتها التي ولدتـها منه.
إن الحوادث من هذا النوع كثيرة جداً، فقد تمتع أحدهم بفتاة تبين له فيما بعد أنـها أخته من المتعة، ومنهم من تمتع بامرأة أبيه.
TRANSLATED
A women came to me to tell me about an incident that had occured with her. She explained to me that one of the Shia Scholar (Sayed Hussein Al-Sader) had mut’ah with her more than 20 years ago and she became pregnant from him. And when he had satisfied his desire from her he departured to some other place (propably to have mut’ah with other women). And after some time she gave birth to a baby girl (a fatherless child, illegitimate in the eyes of the world). She swore to me that the child was from this Sayed (Sayed Hussein Al-Sader) as she never had mut’ah at that time except from him (Allah knows with how many men she had sex? There is no difference between her and a prostitute, may be a prostitute is better cause she doesn’t do it in the name of religion but for money).
And she continued on and said that the child grew up to be a very beautiful women ready to be married away. But to her suprised she discovered that she was pregnant and when she ask her from whom she answered from Sayed Hussein Al-Sader ( Her illegal father).
ORIGINAL
وأعجب من أهل البيت سلام الله عليهم على كثرة ما لقوه من أذى من أهل الكوفة وعلى عظيم صبرهم على أهل الكوفة مركز الشيعة، على خيانتهم لهم وغدرهم بـهم وقتلهم لهم وسلبهم أموالهم، وصبر أهل البيت على هذا كله، ومع هذا نلقي باللائمة على أهل السنة ونحملهم المسؤولية!.
وعندما نقرأ في كتبنا المعتبرة نجد فيها عجباً عجاباً، قد لا يصدق أحدنا إذا قلنا: إن كتبنا معاشر الشيعة -تطعن بأهل البيت عليهم السلام وتطعن بالنبي صلى الله عليه وآله- وإليك البيان:
عن أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام إن غُفيراً -حمار رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله- قال له: بأبي أنت وأمي -يا رسول الله- إن أبي حدثني عن أبيه عن جده عن أبيه: (أنه كان مع نوح في السفينة، فقام إليه نوح فمسح على كفله ثم قال: يخرج من صلب هذا الحمار حمار يركبه سيد النبيين وخاتمهم، فالحمد لله الذي جعلني ذلك الحمار) (أصول الكافي 1/237(.
وهذه الرواية تفيدنا بما يأتي:
1- الحمار يتكلم!
2- الحمار يخاطب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله بقوله: فداك أبي وأمي!، مع أن المسلمين هم الذين يفدون رسول الله صلوات الله عليه بآبائهم وأمهاتـهم لا الحمير.
3- الحمار يقول: (حدثني أبي عن جدي إلى جده الرابع!) مع أن بين نوح ومحمد ألوفاً من السنين، بينما يقول الحمار أن جده الرابع كان مع نوح في السفينة. كنا نقرأ أصول الكافي مرة مع بعض طلبة الحوزة في النجف على الإمام الخوئي فرد الإمام الخوئي قائلاً:
انظروا إلى هذه المعجزة، نوح سلام الله عليه يخبر بمحمد عليه السلام وبنبوته قبل ولادته بألوف السنين.
بقيت كلمات الإمام الخوئي تتردد في مسمعي مدة وأنا أقول في نفسي:
وكيف يمكن أن تكون هذه معجزة وفيها حمار يقول لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله: بأبي أنت وأمي؟! وكيف يمكن لأمير المؤمنين سلام الله عليه أن ينقل مثل هذه الرواية؟!.
لكني سكت كما سكت غيري من السامعين.
TRANSLATED
It was reported by Amirul Mu’min Ali that Guffir prophets donkey said: ” May my parents (donkeys) be sacrificed for you, My father related to me on behave of his father on behave of his grandfather who said: that he was with prophet Noah in the ship. So Noah approached him and messaged his back and said: There will come an offspring from you on whom the Sayed and seal of Prophets shall ride. So thank God that he made me that donkey…..(Usool Al-Kafi 1/237)
Comments of Musawi
Talking Donkey!
A donkey speaking to prophet says: ” May my parents (donkeys) be sacrificed for you (comment from Musawi: It is actually Muslims say that their father be sacrificed for you and NOT DONKEYS).
They Donkey continues or says: “(My father related to me on behave of his father up to his 4 grandfather!) and it is proven that between Noah and Muhammad 1000 years, and here the donkey is saying that his fourth father was with Noah in the ship. Once we were reading Usool Kafi with some students of Al Hausa in Najaf by Imam Al-Khoei, that he said: LOOK to this miracle, Noah is speaking about Muhammad’s prophethood 1000 years before!
I kept quiet and said nothing.
Whoever knows Arabic must take advantage of
http://geocities.com/antishia/4gh.html
In his book Tahreer al-Waseelah, Ayatollah Khomeiny issued a fatwa permitting the Shi’ites to sexually enjoy sexual practices with a suckling toddler, as shown below:
Article 11:
The predominant and stronger opinion is the permissibility of having anal sex with the wife with an aweful disliking, but it is better not to specially with her refusal.
Artcile 12:
It is not permissible to have a sexual entercourse with wife prior to her completion of nine years of age, be it on a perminant or temporary marriage. As for the rest of pleasurable acts such as touching with pleasure, hugging and (placing xxx between) thighs, it is perfectly fine even with a toddler child. In the event he had a sexual entercourse with her prior to her completion of nine years of age but without removing her verginity, there’s no consequential penalty against him.
Q: Can shia trust their children with their grand parents?
may allah curse this lanati dajjal and the rest of the rabbi clique
TAKBIR
his clan……
He never thought Ihed introduce a Khomeini here, in Washington DC
Mister Khomeini warmly greeted in WashingtonGrandson of Iran’s late revolutionary leader calls on Bush to intervene in Iran and install true democracy.
By Patrick Anidjar - WASHINGTON
“Welcome Mister Khomeini.” The grandson of Iran’s late revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini is warmly greeted as he arrives for an appearance at a conservative Washington think-tank.
Facing journalists and researchers in dark suits, Hossein Khomeini, dressed in a traditional white jacket and black turban, took easily to the question-and-answer routine.
“Do you think that Iran today holds an atomic weapon?” fired an Iranian-American journalist in Farsi.
Khomeini’s piercing eyes darkened as his eyebrow furrowed.
“I have no specific information. But it is such a troublemaker regime that I won’t be surprised. And if they don’t have it now, they will have it in the future, I have no doubt about it,” he said, running his finger along his beard, which is not yet as thick as his grandfather’s.
He spoke softly, but still set the tone for 90 minutes of relentless criticism of the Islamic regime in his country.
Hossein Khomeini, a well-educated Shiite Muslim steeped in Western philosophy, had been asked by the ayatollah to keep quiet with his ideas for a true democracy in Iran.
But after his grandfather and his uncle Ahmad died, Hossein received threats and lived in isolation in the holy city of Qom, until he decided to flee across the border with Iraq.
“Under the shah, at least, religious practice was free. Today, after the revolution, Iran is one of the worst dictatorships,” he said, running his fingers along his prayer beads.
Khomeini welcomed the US-led invasion of Iraq, which he said had made it a “free country,” and called on US President George W. Bush to intervene in Iran and install a “true democracy.”
“Iran is intervening now in Iraqi territory, and maybe it will force the United States to intervene in Iran too,” said Khomeini, who has lived in Iraq for several months.
“Mr. Bush should act like Churchill when he gathered around him the British population to fight against Hitler,” he said, before singing the praises of Western democracy and its “indispensable” freedoms of thought and of religion.
Another question, this time about terrorist groups backed by Iran, particularly Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian territories.
“So many questions, I hope it won’t last until tomorrow morning,” he said with barely perceptible smile.
But he doesn’t dodge the question.
“No Muslim should be allowed to have such activities,” he said. “Unfortunately, Iran is a long supporter of terrorism. This regime is one of the most active supporters of terrorism.”
The moderator moved to close the gathering.
“I never thought I’d introduce a Khomeini here, in Washington DC,” he said.
Before leaving, Khomeini wished a “happy new year” to his surprised host.
“The Jewish New Year,” explained the translator.
In Tehran, a government spokesman on Monday said Khomeini was free to say whatever he wished.
“All Iranian citizens, inside or outside Iran, can express themselves freely if they have something to say about the government, which is what he (Khomeini) has done,” government spokesman Abdollah Ramazanzadeh said
maybe too much weed???
And such was the ending of shytan…a living aya for all to see.
May Allah burn the followers of Khomeni and all Rafidhas’ Imams in the hell forever and may Allah humiliate these Majoosi worshippers of Shayateen in this word and the next, Aameen ya Rabbal ‘Alameen.
Posted in *Exposing Khomeini | 2 Comments »