Passing Thirty Years from the Victory of “Islamic” Revolution the Pressure upon Sunnites in Iran is multiplied

Friday, 29 January 2010 17:21

(Summery of Shaikh-ul- Islam Molana Abdul Hamid’s Interview with Nedaye Islam on the Occasion of Arrival of Islamic Revolution to Its Fourth Decade)

The Nedaay e Islam magazine on the occasion of arrival of Islamic Revolution to its fourth decade conducted an interview with the leader of Sunnites in Iran Shaikh ul Islam Molana Abdul Hamid and first of all asked him about the causes that led to the collapse of Pahlavi regime.
According to Molana political tyranny, suppression, dependency to foreigners, oppression and injustice, lack of freedom of expression, political suffocation and bureaucratic and moral corruption were the main factors that pushed people of Iran to revolt against monarchism.
However, he clarified that during previous regime, there have not been any religious or ideological approach in the governing body, so, no discriminative treatment had been exercised in respect to other religions or sects. Molana regarded it as a positive point for monarchic regime.
Explaining the role of late Molana Abdul Aziz _ the ex-leader of Sunnites in Iran- in the victory of Islamic revolution Molana Abdul Hamid said: “Molana Abdul Aziz played an important and active role in the victory of Islamic revolution. Although Molana Abdul Aziz insisted on securing the dignity of different religions and nationalities and their share in power particularly in those provinces where they are in majority, he was opposed to any separatist movement emphasizing on the territorial integrity of Iran. He was also very conscious on co-existence and brotherhood of all Iranians.”
Molana enumerated the founding of the Ittehad-ul- Mulemin Party, taking part in the elections for Assembly of Experts for Writing Constitution and constituting the Council of Shams as Molana Abdul Aziz’s major achievements during the period of 1978-1981.
He said: “The Sunnites and Molana Abdul Aziz at the time of writing the constitution made tremendous efforts insisting that only Islam should be mentioned as official religion without naming any particular sec. however, this demand was not accepted and in practice series of discriminative treatments against Sunnites were begun. But the Sunnites, keeping in mind the national interests and expediency of the country remained at the mainstream participating to every public or national events such as elections, demonstrations etc”.
“By 1983 the recruitment of Sunnites in armed-forces was stopped. Although this kind of treatment was clear violation of constitution, it was clear these discriminative policies were being chalked and introduced from sources linked to the peak of power pyramid” Molana added.
Discussing the reformation era of President Khatami Molana Abdul Hamid said: “When reformists won an open political atmosphere come into being and the Sunnites also took an easier breath feeling little free, however, during that period too the Sunnites did not get the place they deserve. They did not receive any share from the power inherited from the conservatives, and their elites and experts were not taken on board”.
Referring to Ahmadinejad tenure as the worst period for Sunnites in terms of religious freedom as well as their share in power Molana stated: “During the ninth government under presidency of Ahmadinejad gradually pressure upon Sunnites got increased, and since last two years it has been at peak”. “Unfortunately, the Sunnites are stepping to the fourth decade of victory of Islamic revolution in a condition that pressure upon them is multiplied as compared to past, and the atmosphere of frustration and disillusionment is prevalent as they do not see any bright and deserving future for themselves in this country”. He added.
Molana further regarded Sunnites as best factor through them the Islamic Republic of Iran could contact with Islamic world where Sunnites are in majority. He categorized the demands of Sunnites into two categories:
First, involvement of Sunnites in political and administrative decision making at both national and provincial level as well as removal of all forms of discrimination being exercised against them in their recruitment for civil service. Second: ensuring religious freedom of Sunnites that recently has been facing with some challenges from government side. However, he emphasized that expectations of Sunnites are not any sort of prerogatives; rather, they are within the framework of constitution and in accordance to their citizenry and religious rights.
Referring to the disappointment of Sunnites form both Conservatives and Reformists as result of thirty-year-old prejudiced ideological and religious atmosphere Molana stated that it did not seem the Sunnites could get their due rights in the near future.
In response to the question that how he would see the future perspective of Iran in the fourth decade of victory of Islamic revolution and which factors would be determinant for an ideal and better future, he said: “The future of Iran depends to two very important factors: first, competent economic administration of the country that is possible through spending oil and non-oil revenues at the right place, so that tackle down the issues such as poverty and unemployment.
Second, political, social and religious freedom. People should have rights to express their views and constructive critiques about the rulers. Iran should be for all Iranians not for a particular ethnic, wing or religion. All nationalities and religions should have representation and feel that they are contributing in their country’s affairs. The achievement of the above goals would consolidate national unity and national security thus strengthens the foundations of Islamic Republic.

Sheikh AbdulHameed:the discrimination policies must be changed

Wednesday, 27 January 2010 15:40

Sheikh Abdul Hameed demanded the Iranian government to review the discriminatory policies which Sunni sect has been suffering in Iran for many years.
Many of the policies of the Iranian government are not a solution of the problems.Now, it is the time to change these wrong policies, also, the rulers must remove discrimination treatment. Mulana Ismaeelzahi said while dellivering speech in a honoring ceremony to becoming graduates of Khadijat-ul-Kubra girls Islamic School nearby Iranshahr city.
The most important claims of the Sunnis in Iran, which we insist upon is that our legitimate rights should be given to us. The Sunnis always have been subjected to discrimination, govt did not give them their proper required status, with in thirty years since coming out the revolution period the Sunni community has been kept for away the key seats in management of the country. He pointed out that in local offices the given share is very limited.
He added: “All the Sunnis in Iran are Iranians since past till today, they have sacrificed their souls in defending of their country and boundaries. They fought against foreigners, the British and defended their homeland, so the government must participate them in inauguration of the civil administration of the country. Continued Shaykh: We like to see our future as weel as the future of our children bright and shine. It must not come in our minds that Sunni elites are bereaved from posts because of their beliefs.
Shaykh Abdul Hameed Delegated and said: except some articals the Iranian constitution did differentiate between Sunnis and Shiahs only rarely, but the distincting treatment is bieng carried out in implementation of Constitution, which caused the concern and worries of the Sunnis. What I am saying only my demand, rather the elites and dignitaries of Sunni community demanded it all. He demanded: There must be feasible platform to criticize such unlawfull activities and there should be some moves towards dialogues and negotiation, it is better to solve problems rather than putting objections on each other. We certainly know, most of the policies are not crane of the problems. they must be replaced and changed. Carrying out such tyrannical policies is to keep far away the Sunnis from key posts in the country. The goingon situation in Iran which accured after the presidential election asks the officials to reconsider their policies.
“We want to employ in the armed forces as the Sunnis in the former regime who were employed in high positions in the armed forces. We love our country and commiserate for it and we have been demanding officials to reconsider the issues of the Sunnis and resolve their problems.” Sheikh Abdul Hamid said.
He pointed at the end: The biggest concern which Sunnis are facing is religious freedom. We Should enable to teach and study the rulings of Islam and the teachings of our religion to our children in every region of the country with total freedom, and to observe the Friday, Eid and the five prayers without any balk. Let the religious schools maintain its independence and do not interfere to the management of any institution, mosque and religious school. All of these our legitimate rights, we will not go beyond our legitimate rights. He added: We do not have – except few representatives members of the Council – an institution or center in the capital to pursue our issues and we believe that these problems can not be solved without having official presence in the capital to follow the solution of these problems by bringing forth it to the officials in the capital.

Heretical Safawi Tashayyu (Shia) As Government Ideology

(SAFAVID ERA)

How did the founders of Savafid Kingdom turn the Shia which was a sect of a party into government ideology?

* When did this sect witness to political changes and how did it develop?

* How did the canon jurisprudence of Islam which consisted of sharia laws and simple rules take hold of the political and social control of the society?

First of all we must state that those questions do not examine a kingdom which was solely within the process of history and fell a few centuries ago. For, the Islamic government in Iran which is based on political fundamentals and canonical laws of Islam is today faced with these questions.

The young empire of the Safavids needed a standard and civilized form of the Shia sect in order to provide legitimacy to their own sovereignty. The Kizilbashes (Ghezelbash) were devoted to traditions of the Shia sect which were “considered primitive”. Most of the elites and statesmen were Sunni. As a result, none of these groups was in the interest of the efforts which the Safavid state was exerting for search of new horizons. The Safavid state wished to refer to this method in order to raise the level of social awareness and to provide political identity to its own sovereignty.

The founders of the Safavid state aspired to free the Shia sect from belonging to an ordinary party and turn into “a world view of a state”. Countless Shia scholars who had been living Jabel Amal (which was located in Syria and now in Southern Lebanon) at the time were immigrating to Iraq, India and Iran from Damascus together with their families. Those scholars “who were claimed to have emigrated due to the fact that they could obtain no jobs and income in these Sunni areas and they could not implement the rules of their own sect” followed an antagonistic attitude toward the Ottoman presiding board and palace. A few scholars which reached the rank of Mojtahed and who provided courses of canonical law of Islam were followed under the pressure of government. One of these Mojtaheds was even killed by the government and referred to as (“the Second Martyr”). The Safavids believed that the view of “Ijtehad” or “the rational attitude towards Shia” would serve the purpose of legitimatizing their power of sultanate. The Safavids would take on the identity of “the protectors of the Islamic fundamental” vis-à-vis their eternal rival in other words the Ottoman. As a matter of fact, Shah Tahmaseb Safavi trusted the scholars of Jabel Amal very much and favored a family called Korki among them and made a researcher called “Mohaghegh Korki” his undersecretary.

Sheykh Ali Korki who is known as Mohaqeq (meaning researcher) Korki and the author of the famous book (Jame Ol Maghased immigrated to Iraq and began to gain the love of the Safavids in order to assume an important role in the Safavid state order. The real aim of Korki was to settle the Shia sect to the political, administrative and social structure of the society and to apply the Sheriat rules one by one.

Shah Tahmaseb Safavi turned to agreeing with Jabel Amal’s new claims which believed that the person called Faqih (person knowledgeable about the canon jurisprudence of Islam or today’s mullahs) who consider themselves superior in the theology of Jabel Amal would take decisions instead of “the Secret Innocent Imam” and which consider that Faqih should make the political power legitimate! Those claims which granted Faqihs a political power and made them opposed to statesmen and the notables concluded with the domination of Faqihs. For, Kizilbashes would protect them.

The Shia of the Safavid era started with the immigration of the Jabel Amal scholars, however, this sect mixed with the cultural and traditional elements of Iran subsequently and assumed the identity of Iran. Thus, the Shia of Safavid era was not entirely imported. This sect was tried to be raised and spread many times in other countries however, it did not receive the required interest and it only drew attention of the political circles dominating Iran. In fact it is not the right attitude to describe the spread of a religious idea with words such as import and export when assessing a religious thought. For it is utmost important that a specific religious thought should meet the requirements of the country where it is spread. Every country that is in position of host knows how to mix every outside issue with its own culture and moral values in a creative way and benefit from this element in such a way as to point out its own identity. It is a value that is worth of assessing how the Jabel Amal scholars were admitted and absorbed to Safavid structure.

When the Shia sect gained political identity through Jabel Amal scholars, the government was transferred to others temporarily in absence of “the Innocent Imam” in other words “12th Imam”. The Jabel Amal scholars would settle themselves in the state structure according to the needs of Safavid rulers in the face of the Ottoman Empire. Those scholars produced many rules and laws in order to make the political fundamentals of the kingdom legitimate in terms of the canon jurisprudence of Islam. Thus Jabel Amal scholars (originating from Southern Lebanon) would recapture their power of religious content which they lost within the Ottoman borders.

The Safavids who seized power in Iran in 16th century and ruled for 2 centuries are remembered as an important milestone in the Iranian history. For, the Safavids turned the Shia sect into state and public thought and equipped it with social and political fundamentals. When the historians assess the Mongol occupation that was experienced in the Islamic countries, they note that the institution of Caliphate was weakened after this occupation and the sect of Shia had the opportunity to spread more freely. In the end, the Mongol occupation which shook the countries brought Shia a great gift. In other words, if the Mongol occupation was not experienced, it would not be possible for the Shia members to get strong in Iran and to establish dominance.

The sect of Shia which was a primitive and marginal belief system came under the control of those who assumed Velayat-e Faqih and religious experts. After immigrating towards Iran from the south of Lebanon, the Jabel Amal scholars approached to the Safavid State which is the real rival of the Ottoman Empire and reached very important positions in the palace. Although those scholars did not think that the Safavid government was right, they made the rulers legitimate and conveyed the public the views in this direction. Jabel Amal married the eshraf (khahad dasht) and notable circles of Iran over time and they obtained their support as well. Jabal Amal scholars almost all of which belong to a certain family and which are under the protection of a great network of relatives turned in to the official religious officers of the country and produced various rules and laws out of the bed of sheriat.

The seed planted by Jabel Amal Faqihs started to bear fruits almost a century later. With the Jabel Amal School in Southern Lebanon starting to be low on the agenda gradually, the new stream of the Iranian Shia Faqihs started. This new stream would lower the Shia and Faqih thought to the public level and drew quite as many supporters. One of the results of this new stream started to operate as a school educating students under the name of “Elmiyye Basin (Howze-ye Elmiyye)” Thus the effort which was made for the spread of Shia was initiated.

This situation initiated the great dispute between the Faqihs and Sufis. The Faqihs who consider mysticism “as a style of thinking as the sect of the ordinary people and full of novelties and deviations” left Arabic aside and began using Persian which was under the monopoly of Sufis and the Wise (those who adopt the view of education) The understanding of the canon jurisprudence of Islam by the public easily enabled some members of the notable circle to be interested in the canon jurisprudence of Islam closely. The Friday prayer was a political occasion for the Faqihs and it was used by the Faqihs to come to power.

In the Safavid era, the meaning of the word “Mojtahed” suggesting “the person who attained maturity in the religious issues and who can be imitated” also changed. Seyyed Nematollah Jazayeri Al Anvar ol Alnamaniye who was a disciple of Allameh Majlesi who was considered one of the foundation stones of the Shia sect described the Mojtahed concept as “the heir of our Prophet, the caliphate of Allah and the speaking language of our God” and Mojtahed became the focus of the moral and social assessments. Mojtahed had knowledge about this world and the world which we will pass to and the recovery of the society was entirely in his responsibility. This interesting office reached such a position that the Safavid kings would take even their own crowns from the hand of Faqih or Mojtahed al Asrai.

Interview with Iranian Sunnah Sheikh Esmael Zahi

Sheikh Abdol Hamid Esmaeel Zehi, Imam of the Sunnah people of Zahedan, talks to Asharq Al-Awsat.

By Khaled Mahmoud

Asharq Al-Awsat – Sheikh Abdol Hamid Esmaeel Zehi is a leading religious figure amongst Iran’s Sunni community. He is the chairman of Dar al Uloom University in Zahedan and leads the Friday prayer at the Sunni Makki Mosque in Zahedan.

In this interview, he talks to Asharq Al-Awsat about Iran’s Sunni community and its relationship with the Iranian regime.

This is the first interview Sheikh Abdol Hamid has given in months due to the strict supervision that all Iranian Sunnis are subjected to. He has reservations about giving interviews to newspapers and media representatives over the phone. This interview was conducted via email. His brother was imprisoned for four months for publishing photos of attacks on a Sunni school last year in the Baluchestan province.

Q) What is the population of Sunnis in Iran and where do most of them live?

A) They live along most of Iran’s borders. The [Sunni] residents who live on the eastern, south-eastern and north-eastern borders belong to the Hanafi school of thought. The residents along the north and south western borders belong to the Shafey school of thought whilst most Sunnis in Al Ahwaz are Hanbalis. Due to where they are situated geographically, the population there is made up of diverse communities such as the Baloch people, the Kurds, the Turkmen, the Persians, Arabs and the Talysh. Each of these communities has its own language, but the official language of the state is Persian. The Sunnis constitute at least a quarter or a fifth of the country’s population, estimated at more than 15 million out of Iran’s entire population of 70 million. The Sunnis are mainly based in the city of Zahedan, the capital city of the Sistan province. Baluchestan is home to Makki Mosque, Iran’s biggest Sunni mosque, and Darul Uloom University, the country’s biggest Sunni centre of education. The university comprises of a large number of students from all over Iran and from neighbouring countries. In these two religious centres, the important political and religious issues concerning Sunnis are being dealt with and whenever the Sunnis encounter problems or pressure, complaints would be filed there.

Q) Are there any official centres for Sunnis?

A) Unfortunately, there is no official centre or institute in Tehran to follow matters that concern Sunnis with the exception of the Sunni representatives in the Shoura Council, who number nearly 20 out of 280 representatives. Without doubt, this is a very small number bearing in mind the number of the Sunni population. Actually there should be over 40 representatives. The reason the number of Sunni representatives is so little is that the Guardian Council of the Constitution often rejects most Sunni candidates even if they are experienced and competent.

Q) How would you describe the situation of Sunni Muslims in Iran at present?

A) Before the revolution, the royal secular regime was concerned only with maintaining power so it did not see any difference between the Sunnis and the Shia, and the doctrine [one followed] did not play a part in employment or appointment to state positions. As a result, the Sunnis and the Shia equally used to assume government posts, and the Sunnis used to hold senior posts in the police forces as well as in the army. Therefore, the level of concern and confusion about discrimination and inequality was much lower and could hardly be felt.

However, after the revolution, the Shia doctrine dominated and the Shia ideologists took control in the country and were concerned only about the doctrine, therefore, the Sunnis had to confront different problems.

It is worth mentioning that with regards to some construction and development issues in the past thirty years, the new regime provided services to the citizens equally and in all places, and the Sunnis are not worried about these particular issues. The main issue that concerns the Sunnis now is the discrimination in the field of employment within official and major posts. The Constitution stipulated that the official [state] doctrine is Twelver Shia Jaafari Islam and that the President of the Republic must be a Shia. It is for this reason that the Sunnis cannot run for presidency in the elections.

Though the constitution does not forbid the appointment of Sunnis to government positions, not one Sunni has ever been appointed vice president, minister, deputy minister, ambassador or governor. What is even stranger is that they hardly participate in the administration of governorates with Sunni majorities. Therefore, there is clearly sectarianism when it comes to choosing Sunnis for state positions. Even if Sunnis are qualified for the presidential post, or ministerial or government positions, they are deprived of this because of their adherence to their doctrine and ideological opinions.

As for jobs in the police force, the Sunnis were appointed for a short period only following the revolution, and the Sunnis now have no presence in the army. Because of this discrimination, the Sunnis are feeling concerned, tense and isolated.

The second problem faced by the Sunnis concerns doctrinal freedom. Though the constitution stipulates freedom for the followers of all doctrines, there are bodies and institutions that are putting pressure on the Sunnis with regards to educational and doctrinal issues. Consequently, Sunni activists are experiencing serious problems with regards to educational issues in some Sunni areas and Sunni children in some areas are being educated secretly.

The Sunnis do not have one mosque in Tehran, Isfahan, Kerman, Yazd or any other cities with Shia majorities. Furthermore, our Sunni brothers in Tehran were prevented from performing the Friday or the Eid prayers at the school affiliated to the Pakistani embassy recently, and now they if they want to pray they can only do so in some houses. Likewise, in other big cities where there are only a few Sunnis, they take part in the Friday and the Eid prayers in houses, and they are facing real problems in this regard. The Sunnis in cities with Shia majorities are the least fortunate of all Sunnis in terms of ideological issues. They face real problems in building mosques, educating their children and in other religious issues. The complaints filed to state officials are not responded to and are not solved. A resolution was issued recently by the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution forcing the Sunnis to delegate authority over Sunni religious schools and educational centres to the government. In this manner, the government is seeking to take control of Sunni mosques and schools and the Sunnis consider this a disaster and are now uniting against this resolution and objecting the executive measures of this resolution. The state’s success in implementing this resolution would mean depriving the Sunnis of doctrinal freedom all over the country.

In brief, the Sunnis in Iran have two major problems: doctrinal freedom, and the lack of equality in assuming government and administrative posts. For their part, the Sunnis never relinquish their rights, they monitor [their rights] through peaceful means, and demand the government acknowledges their legitimate rights and stops depriving them of their rights because of their beliefs.

Q) What about relations with the Iranian government on an official level?

A) The Sunnis have no official relations with the government, except through the Shoura Council representatives. Sometimes there are visits to Shia clerics and Marjas during which we talk to them about the problems the Sunnis are encountering and we exchange opinions regarding issues that concern the Sunnis.

Q) What is your position on the continuous controversy between the Reformists and the Conservatives?

A) The fundamental motive behind the current controversy is the lack of freedoms stipulated by the constitution such as freedom of the press, freedom of expression, freedom of political parties and political components and other legitimate rights. The ongoing controversy is about these issues as well as the validity of the recent elections. What further aggravated the controversy was a set of other social and political issues in the country. If the government does not take the initiative and make amendments and changes to the ruling regime’s structure, the controversy will have consequences that will affect the regime’s foundation. But if it takes initiative and responds to the people’s legitimate problems then we can expect reconciliation between the two sides. If the government adopts a broader vision of these issues, problems will be solved and the regime will remain.

Q) Do you receive Arab or Islamic support?

A) As Iranian Sunnis, we are yet to receive any kind of Arab or Islamic support. The claims made by extremist parties that Sunnis receive support from Muslim and Arab countries are all baseless and incorrect.

Q) What are the doctrinal disputes between the Sunnis and the Shia?

A) Igniting doctrinal disputes [between the Sunnis and the Shia] will not benefit Islam and Muslims, as the differences are made up by people who have had the door shut [in their face] and their political ambitions blocked. Due to the fierce international campaign against Islam and Muslims, the essence of Islam has been seriously jeopardized recently therefore it is our duty to avoid doctrinal disputes.

Q) Have the attempts made by some Arab and Iranian circles to settle doctrinal disputes been successful?

A) The conferences held in Iran and in other Islamic countries that we hear a lot about are limited in their activities to applause and mere propaganda and in reality they accomplish no tangible achievements. Evidence of this is that they have never been successful at achieving the goal that they set out to reach i.e. settling disputes. There are still doctrinal disputes that are yet to be settled, and the conferences were of no benefit to the Ummah. They did not bring together the Sunnis and Shia in Iran nor did they solve the problems concerning the Sunnis. It would have been more beneficial to the Ummah if these conferences had been held out of sympathy.

Q) To what extent has the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad influenced society in comparison to his predecessor Mohammed Khatami?

A) Under Khatami, political freedoms, political components and the freedom of expression were more protected and the standard of living of the Iranian people was higher under Khatami.

Source:  www.sunni-news.net

Sons of Sunnah Iran  comment: It is worthy to notice that each and every notable Sunnah Iranian Sheikh within Iran has been facing various pressure and even threats from the government, either directly or indirectly. Shaykh Abdol Hamid, as been reported by Sunnah Iranian brothers who actually live in Iran is under high protection of his followers, and the government tried a couple of time to assassinate him by its agents, to make it look as if they (the regime) is not involved in any assassination. This is the common stragedy of the Rafidite Safawid  regime and it is believed that the regime wants to have rather a popular Sunnah Shaikh for the Iranian Sunnah community who is  put under endless restrictions, rather than have a dead/assassinated one, who will thus tun into a martyr. For in the past they poisened through their agents the biggest Sunnah scholar of Iran, Shaykh Mohammad Omar Sarbazi, and this turn to several revolts of the Sunnah Iranian commynity and currently the government is facing  loads of trouble with its own Shia population who disagree with the dictatorship of the Rafidite Wilayat Al-Faqih, thus we hope that the Sunnah Iranian communty will be spared from the harm they usually face, as the main target of the regime and we hope that one day Shaikh Abdol Hamid can speak out AlHaqq (the truth) without any fear, eventhough he compared to others is mentioned things  and  realities  which most Sunnah Iranian Shaikhs don’t dare to talk about

Sunnah & Zaydi Shia Muslims united against the Rafidah and their Regime!

Sunnah & Zaydi Shia Muslims (only Shia group within the fold of Islam) in Yemen united against the Rafidah (twelver Rafidites) and their Safavid Regime! Still the Rafidis around the World insist that the secular Yemeni Gov. is percecuting the Shias of Yemen, eventhough the president is a Shia himself!

Congratulations – Sepah Pasdaran were sent to hell!

Congratulations O Sons of Sunnah Iran – A bunch of Rev. Guards were sent to hell! According to Iran Official News, Deputy Chief, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), General Nur Ali Shustary (may Allah curse him)  were also killed in the attack. More than 6 Top men of the Safavid Rafidite Khomeinistic Revolutionary Guards were sent ila Jahim (Hell), to Khomeini, Ibnu Saba’ and Abu Lo’ Lo’, by the grace of Allah subhana. There is not even a point of refuting the pathetic allegations and excuses of the Lovers of Safavism and Shirk (Rafidi Regime). For they and their Kafir brethren around the www cite how several Iranian Sunni Tribal leaders have been killed as well. These Kuffar and particularry the Rafidah should know better that we Muslims neither worship our scholars nor follow them blindly (Rafidi Taqlid), we are not afraid to speak out against any humand being who speaks out against Islam and Sunnah. Thus, those “Iranian Sunni Tribal Leaders” were nothing but a bunch of filthy hypocrites, palace “Sunni” schloras, working for the Rafidite Safavid regime in order to crush the Sunni resistence of Iran and its people. Munafiqin are not a new phenomenon in Islam and many Sunni Iranian scholars, like the late assassinated Shaykh Karampour may Allah have mercy on him spoke out against those Sunnah scholars who are not ashamed to work with the Satan Khamenei and its anti-Islamic regime.

So: To hell with the Rafidite Safavid regime, its Soldiers, its Guards, its Ayatush-Shaytatin, its “Sunni” Slaves (Munafiqin) and all those who believe in them and assist them, be it with the pen or the sword!

As usual, the pathetic, desperate Rafidite regime blames the United States and the British. Yet, even the pakistianis! who is next to blame? Father Christmas? or even their cave dwelling saviour in Qom*?.  Allah knows best, the reality is, it is an indipendant Sunni Iranian resistance, led by noble balochi Iranians, who are fighting for the rights of Sunni Iraniansaltoghether, be it the Baloch, Kurds or Persian Sunnis, although the unbelievers dislike it.

According to Iran Official News, Deputy Chief, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), General Nur Ali Shustary were also killed in the attack.

Muslims (Sunnah Iranian) sources: sunni-news.com

Kafir Sources:

Suicide bomber [Fida'i/Istish'hadi] kills 31 in attack on Iran Guards

By Fredrik Dahl and Reza Derakhshi

TEHRAN (Reuters) – A suicide bomber killed six senior Revolutionary Guards commanders, including two of its top officers, and 25 other people on Sunday in one of the boldest attacks against Iran’s most powerful military institution.

The attack highlighted deepening instability in the Islamic Republic’s southeast bordering Pakistan and Afghanistan, where many of Iran’s minority Sunnis live and which has seen a spate of deadly bombings and other violence in the last few years.

State media said a local rebel Sunni group called Jundollah (God’s soldiers) claimed responsibility for the attack, the deadliest on the elite Revolutionary Guards in recent years, which also wounded some 30 people at a meeting of tribal chiefs.

The southeastern province of Sistan-Baluchestan is the scene of frequent clashes between security forces, ethnic Baluch Sunni insurgents and heavily-armed drug traffickers.

The region has also been the focus of attacks in recent years by Jundollah, which accuses Iran’s Shi’ite-led government of discrimination. Iranian officials have accused Jundollah of receiving backing from al Qaeda and the United States.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the perpetrators would be “seriously dealt with,” the official IRNA news agency said.

Iran’s armed forces accused the United States and Britain of involvement in the attack carried out by “terrorists” and warned of revenge, the semi-official Fars News Agency reported.

REVENGE?

The deputy head of the Guards’ ground forces, General Nourali Shoushtari, and its commander in Sistan-Baluchestan province, General Rajabali Mohammadzadeh, were among the killed.

“Rigi’s terrorist group has claimed responsibility for the attack,” said state television, referring to Abdolmalek Rigi, leader of Jundollah which is linked by some analysts to the Taliban in neighboring Pakistan.

“Not in the distant future we (Iran) will take revenge … and Baluchis will clear this region from terrorists and criminals,” Fars quoted the armed forces statement as saying, referring to the inhabitants of Sistan-Baluchestan province, where the attack took place.

State television showed footage of three bodies covered with blood-stained clothing and of wounded people being taken to hospital. Glass shards and other debris were scattered at the scene of the attack.

Predominantly Shi’ite Muslim Iran accuses the United States of backing Jundollah to stir trouble in sensitive border areas, a charge that Washington denies. Tehran has also linked the group to the Sunni Islamist al Qaeda network.

In Washington, the United States condemned the bombing and denied it had anything to do with it.

“We condemn this act of terrorism and mourn the loss of innocent lives. Reports of alleged U.S. involvement are completely false,” State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said.

Most people in Sistan-Baluchestan are Sunni Muslims and ethnic Baluchis. Iran rejects allegations by Western rights groups that it discriminates against ethnic and religious minorities.

The Revolutionary Guards is an elite force seen as fiercely loyal to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Its power and resources have increased in recent years. It handles security in key border areas.

FOREIGN ELEMENTS

The bombing and allegations of foreign involvement risk overshadowing talks between Iranian and Western officials in Vienna on Monday intended to help resolve a standoff with the West about Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

“It could damage that dialogue” defense analyst Paul Beaver told Reuters by phone. He said a suicide bombing could indicate links to al Qaeda but he dismissed allegations of a U.S. or British role: “I think it is highly unlikely.”

The attack is also likely to harden the resolve of the clerical and military establishment in confronting the opposition to a disputed election in the summer which saw the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Iranian opposition leader Mirhossein Mousavi said he would press ahead with efforts to reform the Islamic Republic despite a crackdown on protests after the June 12 presidential poll, his website said on Sunday.

The election plunged Iran into its deepest internal crisis since the 1979 Islamic revolution. The opposition says more than 70 people were killed as Revolutionary Guards and Islamic militia put down the protests that erupted after the poll.

Citing a witness, state television said Sunday’s attack occurred when senior Revolutionary Guards officers attending a conference in the southeastern city of Sarbaz went to talk to a group of tribes people making baskets.

English-language Press TV said the suicide bomber was a tribesmen who “detonated his explosives strapped to his body.”

Apart from Shoushtari and Mohammadzadeh, among those killed were also the Guards’ commanders in the cities of Sarbaz and Iranshahr. Shoushtari was also a senior official of the Guards’ elite Qods force.

Jundollah, which claimed responsibility for the bombing of a Shi’ite mosque in May that killed 25 people in Sistan-Baluchestan, says it is fighting for the rights of minority Sunnis in Iran.

Some analysts believe Jundollah has evolved through shifting alliances with various parties, including the Taliban and Pakistan’s ISI intelligence service, who saw the group as a tool against Iran.

(Additional reporting by Parisa Hafezi in Tehran, Peter Griffiths in London and Arshad Mohammed in Washington; Writing by Samia Nakhoul)

Source: Reuters

ANALYSIS – Iran bombing hurts image of Revolutionary Guards

By Alistair Lyon, Special Correspondent – Analysis

BEIRUT (Reuters) – Iranian leaders have blamed foreign foes for a suicide bombing by Sunni militants, masking their shock at an attack that killed 42 people and dented the prestige of the increasingly powerful Revolutionary Guards.

Iranian leaders, already under international pressure over their nuclear policy and facing domestic discontent over a disputed June election, have sworn revenge for Sunday’s attack, which they blamed on the United States, Britain and Pakistan.

“It damages the Revolutionary Guards because people will ask: how can people who can’t look after themselves take care of the country’s security?” said London-based analyst Baqer Moin.

Guards commander Mohammad Ali Jafari said on Monday Iran had documents indicating direct ties between Jundollah and U.S., British and, “unfortunately,” Pakistani spy agencies.

“Behind this scene are the American and British intelligence apparatus, and there will have to be retaliatory measures to punish them,” the ISNA news agency quoted him as saying.

The bombing, the deadliest in years, occurred in the poor and neglected southeastern province of Sistan-Baluchistan, a conduit for smugglers and drug traders near the Pakistan border.

The deputy head of the Guards ground forces was among those killed in the blast, which state media said was claimed by the rebel Sunni Jundollah group, active locally since 2004-5.

The Revolutionary Guards, set up after the 1979 Islamic revolution, have grown over the past 30 years into a potent force with military, political, social and economic interests.

Its influence has expanded since hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected in 2005. The Guards and the Basij religious militia they control, led efforts to quell public protests after Ahmadinejad’s disputed re-election in June.

FEEBLE CONTROL

A study published on Monday by the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment said Jundollah’s existence highlighted precarious security and feeble government control in the region.

“It also shows the limits to Islamic unity within the Islamic Republic itself. This deals a blow to the credentials of the revolution and the international revolutionary aspects of (the late Ayatollah Ruhollah) Khomeini’s doctrine,” it said.

Iran’s harsh accusations — the pro-government Kayhan daily said Israel’s Mossad spy agency was behind the attack — disguised consternation among the leadership, Moin argued. “They have to find a foreign perpetrator to excuse themselves.”

The United States, Britain and Pakistan denied any hand in the bombing, which followed a blast that killed 25 people in a Shi’ite mosque in the provincial capital Zahedan in May.

“The great paradox is that Iran, which has been active in support of different Islamist movements outside her own territory after the revolution, is now faced with serious armed opposition within her own borders,” the Norwegian study said.

Several analysts say Jundollah, believed to be motivated partly by Baluch nationalism and partly by an austere brand of Sunni Islamic militancy, has had links in the past with the Taliban and Pakistan’s ISI intelligence service.

Most say there is no evidence it is connected to al Qaeda, but suggest it may get help from other sympathizers.

“Are there forces in Pakistan who are anti-Shi’ite and anti-Iranian supporting them?” Moin asked. “Are there Wahhabi or Salafi groups in the Gulf supporting them because they think the Shi’ite government in Iran is suppressing the Sunnis?”

COVERT BACKING?

He did not discount Iran’s claims that Jundollah received U.S. backing as part of clandestine efforts to subvert Iran during former President George W. Bush’s administration.

Iran itself may have inadvertently aided Jundollah, according to Lieutenant General Hadi Khan, who was Afghanistan’s deputy interior minister for security from 2006 to 2008.

He told the Jamestown Foundation’s Terrorism Monitor last month that Iran had at one point helped arm Taliban forces fighting U.S. troops in neighboring Afghanistan, despite Tehran’s ideological aversion to the Sunni Taliban militants, and that some Iranian weapons had ended up in Jundollah hands.

“(Iran) wanted to keep NATO forces occupied in southern Afghanistan, but the result was now both Taliban and NATO on their border, and Jundollah attacking from (Afghanistan’s) Zabul province in Pakistani Baluchistan,” Khan said.

Iran denies supplying any weapons to the Taliban.

Khan, who said different Iranian institutions often pursued contradictory policies, described Jundollah as operating freely in the ethnic Baluch regions of Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan.

“When Jundollah started making some attacks against Iranian security forces, Iran realized that covert support of the Taliban was not in their interest,” the former official said.

Moin suggested that the latest bombing might prompt Tehran to review the way it handles the troubled southeastern province.

“It may force them to think hard and have a more flexible strategy in that area, because it has really affected the ability of the Revolutionary Guards to look after themselves, let alone all the other issues,” he said.

(Additional reporting by William Maclean in London; Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

At least 18 people accused of involvement in that attack or jailed as suspected members of Jundollah were later hanged.

Source: Reuters

______________________________

*Note: The Twelver Rafidi Shia Mahdi is not the Muslim Mahdi peace be upon him, actually he (Shia Mahdi) is most surely the Dajjal. All Muslims upon us Sunnah, love the pure Ahl Al-Bayt (ra) and Imam al-Mahdi and no one would ever insult them. Insulting them is regarded as Kufr. Thus we are not ridiculing the Mahdi, but rather a non-existent naked coward whom they believe to have been living in a cave for 1200 years without any contribution to Islam although he is not sleeping and although he has super-powers! Basically, it’s like ridiculing and abusing Santa Claus.

To a Sunni (over 90 percent of Muslims) + Historians+Zaidiyyah Shia the Mahdi of Rafidah Shia does not exist (for the aforementioned groups all believe in the virtious and existence of the 11th Imams who the Shia ascribe to themselves, yet these Imams are as much as innocent of Shi’ism as Jesus peace be upon him is free of Paulism (“Christianity”). Yet none of these groups, except the twelver believe in the existence of a twelve Imam. We believe the 11th Imam had no son whatsoever).  The fact of the matter is that sunnis will not, *CAN not* believe that the mahdi of the sunnis is the same as the mahdi of the shias. The reason for this is that there are virtually NO ahadith that state that he will be the son of Imam Askari.

As for super cave mahdi being naked, then unfortunately that’s what your scholars report, for instance in Haqqul Yaqeen by Baqir Majlissi, P.347.

Dialogue between the Companion of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) vs. the Prince of Persia

Rab`ee bin`Aamir entered upon Rostam, the military leader of Persia, who had 280,000 soldiers under him. Rostam addressed him with arrogance of one who has power, “What brought you here?. . Rab`ee was wearing a thorn robe and had with him a spear and an old horse. Rostam told him laughingly, while his ministers and companions were sitting with him: “You came to conquer the world with this spear, an old horse and a thorn robe?” So Rab`ee ibn `Aamir responded to him, confident in Allah’s help: “Allah sent us to take servants from servitude to (other) servants to servitude of the Lord of servants, and from the narrowness of this world to the vastness of the hereafter, and from the tyranny of religions to the justice of Islam.”

So the wretched one responded to him after the reply of Rab`ee bin `Aamir baffled him: “Do not exit my palace or hall until you carry soil on your head”, so Rab`ee bin `Aamir carried soil and said to his companions, “This is a glad tiding that Allah will let us (Muslims: Persian, Arab, Ethiopians) own their land.” Later, Sa`d bin Abi Waqqaas entered this land victoriously and entered the hall of misguidance and smashed the den of the Persian idolatry, and said, what was related in the Qur’an, “How much they left behind of gardens and springs and crops and noble sites and comfort wherein they were amused. Thus. And we caused it to be inherited by another people.” [Ad-Dukhaan, 44:25-28] “These are two adversaries who have disputed over their Lord.” [Hajj, 22:19] Such end befell those who did not know Allah, who did not obey his orders, nor shunned what He forbade.

بزرگترین پایگاه اینترنتی پاسخ به شبهات (شيعه رافضه) افتتاح شد

پایگاه اطلاع رسانی پاسخ به شبهات «اسلام تکس» راه‌اندازی شد. به گزارش پایگاه اطلاع رسانی اهل سنت (سنی نیوز)، این پایگاه اینترنتی با هدف مقابله با خطر شبهات دشمنان اسلام، ارائه مقالات دینی و پاسخ به سؤالات و شبهات  به زبان فارسی فعالیت خود را آغاز کرد . از بخش های مهم این پایگاه اینترنتی می توان به تالارگفتمان، ارسال سوالات، بانک مقاله، قرآن کریم، رد شبهات، فکر و اندیشه و غیره… اشاره کرد

چرا وبسایت اسلام راستین فیلتر می شود آنهم با این سماجت وسرعت زیاد؟  دیروزافتتاح شدو کمتر از ۲۴ ساعت در بیشتر نقاط ایران مسدود وغیر قابل دسترسی …

پایگاه پاسخ به شبهات شامل هیچ یک از مصادیق تخلف در بندهای مصوبهء شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی و یا آیین نامهء هیئت دولت نمی گردد . یعنی مطالبش واقعا ناقض هیچ قانونی نیست . بنابراین از نظر شکلی فیلتر کردن این وبسایت خود عملی غیر قانونی محسوب می شود.

سایت پاسخ به شبهات در جهت اتحاد  بین مسلمانان شیعه وسنی و حل مشکلات فیما بین تلاش میکرد که باعث ترس رژیم شده بود.

این سایت در جهت روشنگری و افشای دروغهای کسانی  که نان خودشان راه در دروغ گفتن به مردم در می آوردن فعالیت چشمگیری داشت.

از نظر  محتوایی نیز مطالب این وبسایت خلاف هیچ قانونی نیست. روزانه هزاران برابر این مطالب نیز در سایت های مذهبی شیعه با شدت واهانت به مقدسات اهل سنت منتشر می شوندو .هیچ مسئولی پاسخگوی آن نیست .

بنابراین در فیلتر کردن این وبسایت تنها چیزی که مد نظر فیلتر کنندگانش قرار نگرفته است همان قانون فیلترینگ کشور و آیین نامهء مصوب هیئت دولت و نیز مصوبهء شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی بوده است .

شخص یا اشخاصی که خود را به اصطلاح حافظ آزادی وقانون میدانند، تصور نمی رود دلشان به حال این ملت مظلوم سوخته باشد.  به گونه ای کاملا خودسرانه ، غیر قانونی ، شخصی و احتمالا محفلی و از سر لجاجت و کینه توزی و نفرتی که از اسلام واقعی دارند انجام می گیرد .

لازم به ذکر است این سایت قبل از افتتاح رسمی، توانسته بود بسیاری از برادران تشیع را تحت تاثیر خود قرار دهد .

http://www.islamtxt.net/

آدرس های جدید این سایت برای دوستانی که در ایران هستند،  از خبر نامه اعلام می شود.

The Ahlus-Sunnah of Qom!

پیروان آل و اصحاب در قم

اهل سنت در قم! اينجا كليك كنيد

We are proud to present you a new Blog, a Blog, absolutely unique of its kind:

http://sunnah-qom.blogspot.com/

A Blog made by former Rafidah (Twelver Shi`ah) students and teachers of Qom. Yes Qom! the Vatican of the Shi`ah Rafidah, the womb of Shirk, paganism and superstitions. These former Shi`ahs declared war on the cult of Rafidah, that has corrupted the minds of modern day Iran. A sect, which is based on exaggeration with saints (“Imams”) and Temples (“Shrines of Imams”). A sect which only claims to follow the pure Ahlul Bayt (ra) (household of the noble Prophet peace be upon him), yet their teachings and deeds absolutely contradict the path of Ahlul Bayt (ra).

Yet these former Shi’`ah are not as rare as one may thought. After the awakening of the Sunnis of Iran, due to the Internet and Sunni Satellite channels, we have witnessed the fear of the Rafidi Shi’ah clerus and how it expressed its fear towards the growing number of native Sunni inhabitants in Iran. (a well known Video among Farsi speakers, showing a representative  (Rafidi cleric) of Khamenei, crying about the growing number and activities of Sunni Iranians, will be translated and published soon, Insha’Allah have major websites like. The growing number of the Sunnis in Iran and the growing number of proper former Shi`ahs who translated volumes of Books (here a list of former Iranian Shi`ah Ayatollahs, scholars, students etc.: ) are spreading throughout the www. There are the two major arabic websites, run by former Shi’ahs like newshia.com and wylsh.com and last but not least, the confession of one of the major Ayatollahs of Iran:

Indeed, falsehood is ever bound to vanish, even in Qom, by the followers of Ahul Bayt (ra) and the Sahabah (ra), the Ahlus-Sunnah of Qom:

sunnah-qom.blogspot.com

Exclusive Compilation of Persian Sunnah Anashid

Over 5o Persian Anashid, from the brethren of Ahl al-Sunnah of Iran. This compilation is very rare, thus we have included every Farsi Nashid we could find. It contains more than 50 Anashid, the vast majority are Anashid from your Sunnah brethren of Hormozgan (south Iran), Balochestan (south-east) and the Khorassan area of Iran. We have also included some Dari (Afghan Persian) Anashid. Click on the Tape to download the compilation: (Note you will have to download winrar, to open the file. Winrar is a freeware program.)

The Turban – Opium Of The Safavids DVD

(English Subtitled) exposing the Rafidah (Imamite Shias)

The Film which was prevented from publishing in Iran and warned by Lebanese Hezbollah not to be watched in forums,

The Film which made the advocates of Safavid Shi’ism Suffer

All Praises And Thanks Be To ALLAH

After the big achievement that the Film has made it

And the collapse that it caused to the Shi’ite websites and forums

After the big demands to translate it to English,

So our Muslim brothers can see the real face of Shi’ites creed

Here we are now presenting to you the English Edition of:

To Download the complete DVD click:

High Quality Format 650 Mb

http://realitymediapk.com/theturban/theturbanhigh.wmv
Medium Quality Format 338 Mb

http://realitymediapk.com/theturban/theturbanmedium.wmv
Low Quality Format 209 Mb

http://realitymediapk.com/theturban/theturbanlow.wmv
Very Low Quality FLV format 100 Mb

http://realitymediapk.com/theturban/theturbanhigh_.flv
Watch Online

theturbanhigh_.flv

INTRO:

Reality Of Ahmadinejad – The Sahabah hating JEW!

Reality Of Ahmadinejad

Mahmoud Saborjhian the son of a blacksmith, was born near Garmsar in the village of Aradanon October 28, 1956. In the 1950s, Ahmadinejad and his family moved from Aradan to Tehran in search of more economic prosperity It was during this time period that the Saborjhian family changed its name to Ahmadinejad.

About name Sabourjhian information can not be seen in wikipedia in Danish or Farsi, just in English french and German. this is important because Saborjhian is a Jewish family name, in fact the jhian is used just by non Muslim and mostly by Jews, for example there are two ric Jewish family in iran with jhian in the end of their name, they are Badamjhian and Zorofjhian.

Mohsen Rezaei is a very prominent figure in Iran, ex chif commander of the Revolutionary Guard and currently a member of the Supreme Council, He is the first to mention Ahmadinejad’s Jewish background in a public statement. which caused a shut down of the internet in Iran, Iraq and part of Pakistan for many hours until the article that was writen in farsi and in his website Baztab.com was taken away, so internet was back again!

Original inquiries into the subject were spurred by Persian blogger Dr. Mehdi Khazali, who secondly raised the issue of the president’s heritage during Iran’s June presidential elections. (The blog has since been deleted by the Iranian government and he was even arrested http://www.ihrv.org/inf/?p=2426.) The president was asked to identify his name during a debate. Challenged by his opponent, “My full name is Mehdi Karroubi. What is your full name?” Ahmadinejad responded, but without including Sabourjian as one of his surnames.

Ahmadinejad has admitted that his family changed its name when he was young, but has provided few details. According to Iranian government documents and family members, his original family name was Sabourjian or “cloth-weavers.” That name, although present among Muslim Iranians, often indicates a minority background. Despite the official position, another former family name alleged by Ahmadinejad watchers has been Sabaghian, or “cloth-dyers.” It doesn’t matter much which name it was, given the similarity of the jobs they describe: Traditionally in Iran, both the coloring and weaving of cloth were professions left to non-Muslims as religiously unclean activities.

A photograph of the Iranian president holding up his identity card during elections in March 2008 clearly shows his family has Jewish roots because the close-up of the document reveals he was previously known as Sabourjian – a Jewish name meaning cloth weaver.

The short note scrawled on the card suggests his family changed its name to Ahmadinejad when they converted to embrace Islam after his birth.

The Sabourjians traditionally hail from Aradan, Mr Ahmadinejad’s birthplace, and the name derives from “weaver of the Sabour”, the name for the Jewish Tallit shawl in Persia. The name is even on the list of reserved names for Iranian Jews compiled by Iran’s Ministry of the Interior.

Experts suggested Mr Ahmadinejad’s track record for hate-filled attacks on Jews could be an over compensation to hide his past.

Ali Nourizadeh, of the Centre for Arab and Iranian Studies, said: “This aspect of Mr Ahmadinejad’s background explains a lot about him.

“Every family that converts into a different religion takes a new identity by condemning their old faith.

“By making anti-Israeli statements he is trying to shed any suspicions about his Jewish connections. He feels vulnerable in a radical Shia society.”

A London-based expert on Iranian Jewry said that “jian” ending to the name specifically showed the family had been practising Jews.

“He has changed his name for religious reasons, or at least his parents had,” said the Iranian-born Jew living in London. “Sabourjian is well known Jewish name in Iran.”

The Iranian leader has not denied his name was changed when his family moved to Tehran in the 1950s. But he has never revealed what it was change from or directly addressed the reason for the switch.

Relatives have previously said a mixture of religious reasons and economic pressures forced his blacksmith father Ahmad to change when Mr Ahmadinejad was aged four.

The Iranian president grew up to be a qualified engineer with a doctorate in traffic management. He served in the Revolutionary Guards militia before going on to make his name in hardline politics in the capital.

After the revelation of this thing A spokesman of the Israeli embassy in London said it would not be drawn on Mr Ahmadinejad’s background. “It’s not something we’d talk about,” said Ron Gidor, a spokesman.

Many Iranians who support Ahmedinejad ex Mahmoud Sabourjhian written this thing that

“As Ahmadinejad claims to be from a multigenerational Shiite family, the name change in the 1950s was unusual. It is true that, as Ahmadinejad’s relatives have noted, there was steady migration from villages to Tehran during the late 19th and 20th centuries. But urbanizing families did not tend to change their names so radically — not even to conceal humble backgrounds.

If Ahmadinejad is indeed of Jewish descent, his family’s story represents a classic pattern for religious converts: Adopt Islam, leave the hometown where people might know you as a Jew, move to a new location where blending into the Muslim population is easier, take up different occupations, and, just in case anyone were to question their confessional fidelity, demonstrate zeal for Islam by attacking their former religion and other minority faiths”

This was the reaction and answer given by supporters of Jewish Ahmedinejad.

We can make conclusion how the Rafidi Safawi regime is making the whole world fool. Khomaini who was also a Agent of CIA just came to Iran to ruin the Government of Shah using the label of Islamic Revolution and his family back ground was also exposed here

http://realitymediapk.com/khomainiexposed/

It is time to wakeup and see who is who in reality a Jew Hiding his faith making stupid and false claims that he will wipeout the Israel from the map of the world to fool the whole Muslim World by giving such Statements that he will do this he will do that but in reality he is just Killing the People of Ahlus Sunnah in Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Lebnon and in many other countries by using the Iranian Intelligence agencies…..

Open Your Eyes Before it is To late.

حقيقت ايران باستاني چيست؟ What is the truth about the pre-Islamic Iran?

اهل سنت ایران انتخابات رژیم آخوندی را تحریم مینماید

هر کسی که در این انتخابات شرکت کند بدون شک قانون خداوند متعال رو زیر پا گذاشته است

و در اهانت به ام المومنین و صحابه کرام شریک است و ….

ما انتخابات را تحریم میکنیم ….اما میدانم که این ابلحان رافضیان و ایت الشیاطین یک قانونی برای فریب مردم طرح ریزی میکنند و مردم ساده را بار دیگر به صحنه انتخابات میکشانندما همه مطمین هستیم انتخاب فقط رای خامنه ای محاسبه میشود هر رای که خامنه ای به صندوق بیندازد همان هم ریس جمهور میباشد اون هم کسی جز احمقی نژاد نیست (زیرا با امام زمان ارتباط دارد هاله نور). این روافض نه فقط به اهل سنت بلکه هر شیعه ای که مخالف ولایت فقیه گرگ باشد هم رحم نکرده و نمیکنند. مخالفت با ولایت فقیه =با مخالفت با قانون الله

حسبی الله نعم الوکیل

من رای نمیدهم

نه نه نه من رای نمیدهم نه نه نه رای نمیدهم
به آنچه که مرا صد پاره کرده است
هم میهن مرا آواره کردهاست
به قتل بی دلیل به حاکم رذیل
به دشمن قلم به قاضی ذلیل
من رای نمیدهم رای نمیدهم
به چوبه های دار به جنگ و کارزار
به فقر ملتی در اوج افتخار
به اختیار تام به مرگ و انهدام
به وحشت مدام به قهر وانتقام
من رای نمیدهم رای نمیدهم
به کشتن نفس با خنجرهوس
بر مرگ بی صدا در گوشه قفس
به آنکه در زمین با نام عدل و دین
بر باد داده است آن میهن مهین
من رای نمیدهم رای نمیدهم

Ahmadinejad slanders the Sahabah on Air!

نقل فارسي

https://www.sunni-news.com/?p=3352

http://www.ayandenews.com/fa/pages/?cid=8898

We already reported about Ahmadinejad the Rafidi Shiite, the blooy Mushrik  who slandered the Sahabah and uttered clear-cut Shirk. Under the reign of this follower of Khomeini (May Allah curse him) the Ahl Al-Sunnah of Iran suffered a suffering which they have never faced before since the begin of the paganistic Rafidi Khomeinistic Revolution. Yet  only a  few days before the 2009 presidency elections Iran the Rafidi-Safawi president of Iran,  Ahmadinejad exposed again the real face of the hypocrite Shia-Rafidi state of Iran and the true beliefs of a proper Rafidi like himself. Live on Air, on the Shabaka 3 channel of the “Islamic” Republic of Iran this so called president of the “Islamic” state shamelessly accused two of the noble companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him, his household and his companions), namely Talhah and Zubayr of Apostasy!

Ahmadinejad said:

“طلحه وزبير از ياران پيغمبر بودند ولي بعد از پيغمبر منحرف گرديده وبه طرفداري از معاويه پرداختند”

“Talhah and Zubayr were of the Prophets companions, yet after his demise they became corrupted (turned their backs) and followed Muawiyah”

Source: Sunni-News of Iran

Ahmadinejad was trying to make a point by making a cheap, heretical comparison between the Companions of the Prophet (saws) and the politicians of today (linking it to his rival Mousavi) who first promise and fight for the people and later on turn their backs on them.

We don’t even need to mention how this retarted Mushrik billah is slandering more than 15 million Sunni Iranians and their beliefs, or to say the least the biggest religious minority of Iran, for this Rafidi is slandering the beliefs of 90% of the Muslims worldwide, yet there are still some individuals out there who support and chant for this Rafidi state and a Sahabah hating Rafidi like Ahmadinejad for they (those who chant) are either unaware of the beliefs of Shiism and a Rafidi like Ahmadinjad who is a twelver Rafidi, or they don’t want to understand that this regime and every Rafidi who is upon the Religion of twelver Shiism is an open enemy to the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them).

Important note:

Ahmadinejad said on air on Iranian state television:

‘Talhah and Zubayr were of the Prophets companions, yet after his demise they became corrupted (turned their backs) and followes Muawiyah’

Subhanallah (Glory be to Allah)! who exposes the sharlatans and enemies of the Prophets companions at their very own hands! This statement of Ahmadinejad is a complete refutation of himself. All his credibility (if he ever had any anyway) are gone, for he uttered his complete ignorance of Islamic History. Talhah and Zubayr, the two noble companions of the Prophet (saws) never fought with Muawiyah for they died long time before in the battle of Jamal in the Islamic year of 36 whereas Muawiyah became King in 41, thus Talhah and Zubay never joined Muawiyah for they were already dead!

We ask Allah the almighty to eradicate this regime of Shirk and Rafd and may Allah help the Ahl Al-Sunnah of Iran to get rid of theoffspring of the Safawid Rafidites! Ameen!

Ahmadinjad the Rafidi who expressed nothing but the basic bliefs of twelver Shiism, as declared ages before him by Khomeini the accursed one and co.!

This accursed Rafidi, expressed the basic belief of twelver Rafidi Shiism, namely that almost all of the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him, his household and his companions) turned Apostates after his demise, except a hanfull! This is not his personal view, neither is he an “extreme” twelver Shiite, nay! the reality is he is declaring nothing but the basic beliefs of the Religion of twelver Shiism (Al-Rafidah), as been declared by their most important books and sayings of their giant scholars:

Marked Part:

Abi Ja’far (“infallible” Imam of the Shia) said,’ The people apostated after the demise of the Prophet (saws) except of three.’ We asked him who are they ? He said:” Al-Miqdad, Abu Tharr and Salman Al-Farsi.

If all of that were mentioned in ONE book and by ONE scholar we would have accepted it to be weak in Rafidah Religion.

Let us make a list of some SHIA SCHOLARS who say that all sahaba turned apostate except few.

Kulaini
Al-Kashi
Ali Bin Ibrahim Al-Qummi
Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi

Now lets see how many ahadeeths speak the same.

All Sahabah companions except 3 left Islaam after demise of Nabi.
Anwaar – No’maan Niyyah – P245. Vol 2. Nimatullah Jafaari./ Furu Kafi, Kitaabul Raudah :115 – Mullah Muhammad bin Yaqoob Kulaini Vol 3 P115/ Usul -e-Kafi Vol 2, P 246 Rijaal Kashi P. 504.

Sahabahbecame infidel by denying the divine right (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali. First three caliph and other Sahabas became infidel by denying the divine right of (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali. (Usool Kaafi, Page No. 420)


All the people rejected Islam after the death of the Prophet except three. Miqdad, Abu Zar and Salman Farsi. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 134)

The Munafiqeen (i.e. Sahaba) took very much out of Quran (took out the verses).” (Ihtijaj at Tabrasi, page #382).

There was no sahabi who believed in the Rafidi fairy-tale of Ali being infallible Imam (not even Ibn Abbas from the Ahl Al-Bayt!), which means all are apostates.

What is the truth about Talhah and Zubayr?

Talha ibn Ubayd-Allah and  Zubair ibn al-Awam were one of the two companions, whom the Prophet (saws) promised the Paradise.
Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Akhnas said that when he was in the mosque, a man abused Ali (RA). So Saeed bin Zayd got up and said: “I bear witness to the Apostle of Allah (SAWS) that I heard him say: “Ten persons will go to Paradise: “Abu Bakr will go to Paradise, Umar will go to Paradise, Uthman will go to Paradise, Ali will go to Paradise, Talha will go to Paradise: Zubair bin Al-Awwam will go to Paradise, Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas will go to Paradise and Abdur-Rahman bin Awf will go to Paradise. If I wish, I can mention the tenth.” The People asked: “Who is he?” so he kept silence. They again asked: “Who is he?” He replied: “He is Saeed ibn Zayd.” He then said: “The company of one man whose face has been covered with dust by the Apostle of Allah (SAWS) is better than the actions of one of you for a whole life time even if he is granted the life-span of Noah.” [Abu Dawud]

These Ten Companions are listed below, together with the dates of when they lived and died:

1. Abu Bakr As-Siddiq (51 B.H-13 A.H; 573-634 C.E)
2. Umar bin Al-Khattab Al-Farooq (40 B.H-23 A.H; 584-644 C.E)
3. Uthman bin Affan Ghani Dhun-Nurayn (47 B.H- 35 A.H; 577-656 C.E)
4. Ali bin Abi Talib (23 B.H- 40 A.H; 600-661 C.E)
5. Talha bin Ubaidullah (28 B.H-36 A.H; 596-656 C.E)
6. Zubair bin Al-Awwaam (28 B.H-36 A.H; 596-656 C.E)
7. Abdur-Rahman bin Awf (passed away 31 A.H/654 C.E)
8. Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas (23 B.H-55 A.H; 600-675 C.E)
9. Saeed bin Zaid (passed away 51 A.H)
10.Abu Ubaidah Aamir bin Abdullah bin Al-Jarrah.

In the battle of Jamal, the Hypocritesand rebels from both sides (Alis and Aishas) started the battle well known Jamal battle on both sides, yet Zubair was unwilling to fight against Ali and left the battlefield. It is said that during the battle Ali called Zubair and recalled him the saying of Prophet Mohammad that:

“

You will one day fight against Ali, over an unjust cause

”

Recalling this saying of Prophet Mohammad (saws), Zubair left the battlefield and was killed during prayers by one of the soldier of Ali’s army who was chasing him. On hearing the news of Zubair’s assasination, Ali is reported to have said to the killer of Zubair:

“

May you burn in hell

”

So let us, the Ahl Al-Sunnah, the real followers of Ahl Al-Bayt (i.e. Ali) say the same to the enemy of Zubayr in this age:

‘May you burn in hell Ahmadinejad!

For even Shia sources approve the love of Ali (ra) towards his brothers Al-Zubayr and Talhah:

Amir Al-Mu’mineen Ali even mourned for Talhah and Zubayr when they were killed.

“Both Talha and Zubayr fell, and Imam `Ali magnanimously mourned the fallen and had them honourably buried”

Source: Shiite website of the Iranian regime

Rafidah Shias are indeed pathetic. The way they define a righteous is by comparing it to infallibility. This is a status only restricted to Prophets. Talha (ra) and Zubair (ra) were great Companions. Even Imam Ali (ra) acknowledged this in their funerals. He also pointed out the sacrifices that they made from Islam. The reality is when it comes to the status of the Sahabah the Rafidah Shais  judge them like the Khawarij judge the Muslims.

This is the balanced Sunnah view.

قال العلامة الفاخوري رحمه الله في كتابه تحفة الأنام في تاريخ الاسلام ص67:

“على أن معشر اهل الحق من اهل السنة والجماعة يعتقدون أن معاوية كان مخطئاً، بغى على الإمام الحق علي بن أبي طالب لسبق البيعة والخلافة له رضي الله عنه، وهو مصيب بمحاربة معاوية وأصحابه بحكم قتال أهل البغي من المسلمين، ولذا لم يعاملهم معاملة المرتدين ولاالكافرين، وأن عائشة وطلحة والزبير رضي الله عنهم قد رجعوا عن خطئهم بخروجهم في وقعة الجمل على أمير المؤمنين، وقد ندموا على خروجهم متأسفين، والندم توبة من الخطيئة، فاتبع الحق ولاتتبع الهوى فيضلك عن سبيل الله والله أعلم”. اهـ.

- Allama Al-Fakhouri, the grand Shafi’iy Mufti of Beirut ( rahmatullahi alayhi) said in his book “ Tarikh al-islam” ( History of Islam), page 67:

“ The people of righteousness ( Ahlul Haqq) of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jam’a believe that Mu’awiyah was mistaken, transgressed on the righteous Khalifah Ali bin Abi Taleb. As he had the Bay’ah and Khilafah, radiya’Allahu anhu. And that he –Ali- is righteous in fighting Mu’awiyah and his companions based on the rules of Transgressors of Muslims, hence, he did not treat them as Kuffar (blasphemers) nor rejectors. And that Aisha, Talha and Zubair, radiya’Allahu anhum, all repented for their mistake to go to the battle of Jamal, and they regretted it sorrowfully. Regret is a sign of –sincere- repentance, so follow the truth not your desires, otherwise you will deviate from the path of Allah, and Allah knows best”.

Aishah (ra), Talhah (ra) and Zubair (ra) repented after they transgressed. There is a verse in the Quran which asks for sinners to be forgiven.

40:7. Those (angels) who bear the Throne (of Allah) and those around it glorify the praises of their Lord, and believe in Him, and ask forgiveness for those who believe (in the Oneness of Allah) (saying): “Our Lord! You comprehend all things in mercy and knowledge, so forgive those who repent and follow Your Way, and save them from the torment of the blazing Fire! (al Quran)

But Of course we know that Ali is the demigod of the Rafidah Shias so  insulting or even cursing him makes one obviously an Infidel/Fasiq/Fajir.

Rawafid you usually bring up a Ahadith ‘..no one but a believer would love you (Ali)…’ that is mentioned in Sahih Muslim. But what about the Ansar and Muhajireen ?And since Rawafid are ignorants of Sunni narrations, they fail to notice the five Ahadith that preceed the “loving Ali” Ahadith, and they are…

1- It is reported on the authority of Anas that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and blessings Be upon him) observed: The sign of a hypocrite is the hatred against the Ansar and the sign of a believer is the love for the Ansar.

2- It is narrated on the authority of Anas that the Apostle (may peace and blessings be upon him) said: The love of the Ansar is the sign of faith and hatred against them is the sign of dissemblance.

3- Al-Bara reported it from the Apostle (may peace and blessing be upon him) that he observed with regard to the Ansar, None but the believer loves them, none but the hypocrite hates them. He who loved them loved Allah and he who hated them hated Allah. I (the narrator) said: Did you hear this hadith from al-Bara’? He said: To me, he narrated it.

4- It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and blessings be upon him) said: A person who believes in Allah and the Last Day never nurses a grudge against the Ansar.

5- It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa’id Khudri that the Messenger of Allah observed: The person who believes in Allah and the Last Day never nurses a grudge against the Ansar.

So if we were to follow Rafidi illogic, then we shall reach to the conculsion that Ali (ra) was a hypocrite, since he fought against an army that had Ansar in it.

But Alhamdullillah we are not from the Rafidah to jump to stupid conculsions. The fact is that the war/insults etc did not take place due to hatred of one another, but due to dispute in the matter of Qisas for Othmans (ra) blood.

Allah (swt) said: If two parties of believers fall into a quarrel, make ye peace between them.

Allah didn’t called one party to be hypocrite or Kuffar but addressed them but as believers. And then He (swt) said: “Indeed the believers are but Brothers. Therefore reconcile the differences between your brothers,

Even the most sacred Rafidi Book (Nahj Al Balagha) (fabricated book according to us) contain such statmen (Namely that Muawiya and co. were considered as brother in faith by Ali):

The thing began in this way: We and the Syrians were facing each other while we had common faith in one Allah, in the same Prophet (s) and on the same principles and canons of religion. So far as faith in Allah and the Holy Prophet (s) was concerned we never wanted them (the Syrians) to believe in anything over and above or other than what they were believing in and they did not want us to change our faith. Both of us were united on these principles. The point of contention between us was the question of the murder of Uthman. It had created the split. They wanted to lay the murder at my door while I am actually innocent of it.

source: Rafidi website al-islam.org

Here you go… Clear proof that doesn’t need explaination, however I will walk you through it…

A) We and the Syrians were facing each other while we had common faith in one Allah

from this part we can conclude that the Syrians who pledged allegiance to muawiya (and headed by Muawiya) had faith in ALLAH!

B) …in the same Prophet

the Syrians who pledged allegiance to Muawiya (which include muawiya r.a. and were headed by muawiya ) BELIEVED in MUHAMMAD as the messenger of Allah and from amongst them was Moghaira Ibnu Shu3ba!.

and to blast the Rawafid away : In Sunan Bayhiqi it is narrated that on the eve of the war of Jamal, Ali Radhi
Allaahu ta’ala ‘anh was asked about the opponents (Talha and Zubayr etc.):

“Are they Mushrikeen?” He replied:
“They have run from shirk and come into Islaam”
Then he was asked “Are they Munafiqeen?”
He replied “Munafiqeen are those who don’t remember Allah, except a little
(while the opponents do a lot of Zikr)”
Then he was asked “Then what are they?” He replied:”They are our brothers who
have rebelled from us”
[Sunun Bayhiqi - Dairat ul Ma'arif edition page 173 vol 8]

____________________________________________

Click here for more authentic information about the dispute between the great companions of the Prophet (saws)

Ali and Zubayr and Talha and co. at the battle of Jamal.

and here!

Unrest Mounts in the Iranian Sunni city of Zahedan

report

June 2, 2009

Unrest Mounts in Zahedan

Yesterday’s attack on Molavi Abdolhamid Esmaeil Zehi, Zahedan’s Sunni Friday prayer leader, while he was visiting the Ali Ibn Abitaleb mosque to pay homage to the victims of last Thursday’s bombing, further intensified tensions in the city of Zahedan.

Though various sourced published contradictory reports about an assassination attempt on Zahedan’s Sunni Friday prayer leader and the death of one of his bodyguards, Molavi Abdolhamid indicated that the incident “was not an assassination,” adding, “We were there to pay homage to the martyrs of the bombing when we were attacked.  We had condemned the bombing, and were praying for the victims, but some people came and shouted slogans against us.”

Noting that “we are attempting to return calm and peace to the city,” Molavi Abdolhamid told the E’temad daily, “During the clash one bodyguard was beaten up, but when the news got out people held protests across the city and apparently some have been killed.”  Zahedan’s Sunni Friday prayer leader said that the number of the dead from Saturday and Sunday’s clashes are not known, but added that at least “two people were killed, there are clashes across the city and problems have arisen.”  He also commented on the encircling of his house, which is located near the Makki Mosque (catering to the Sunni community), by security officers and said, “When people heard about the attack on me they gathered at the mosque for protest.”

Jundollah’s Verbal Attack against Molavi Abdolhamid

The attack on Zahedan’s Sunni community leader took place even though Molavi Abdolhamid and several other prominent Sunni leaders had condemned last week’s deadly bombing at the Shia Ali Ibn Abitaleb mosque, in a series of statements calling for the apprehension and punishment of its perpetrators.

Coinciding with the attack on Zahedan’s Sunni Friday prayer leader, the terrorist group Jundollah (God’s Soldiers), which took responsibility on the Internet for last week’s deadly bombing, blasted Zahedan’s Sunni Friday prayer leader.

In its statement, noting that only one out of the three individuals hanged on Saturday was a member of the organization, Jundollah criticized Zahedan’s Sunni Friday prayer leader, warning, “With your speech on Friday, you approved of the execution of these young men, paving the way for the regime to continue to execute innocent young men.  This will not be overlooked by God.”

Larijani: Sunni Community not Involved in Bombing

Speaking about the Zahedan bombing, which left at least 23 dead and dozens wounded, the Islamic Republic’s Majlis Speaker, Ali Larijani, told ISNA on Saturday, “The reason for bombing a Shia mosque is to infuriate the public against the Sunni community.  It is clear to us that this incident was not carried out by Zahedan’s Sunni community.”

Larijani called on the families of the victims to remain calm, adding, “The families of the martyrs will certainly remain calm.  They must know that investigating this incident requires calm so that our security forces can proceed with their task.”

On the other hand, Hosseinali Shahriari, Zahedan’s representative in the Majlis, said in threatening remarks, “In Sistan and Baluchistan security must be either for all or for none.  It can’t be the case that only the Shia community lacks security.”  He insisted, “People who are known to be supporting the Wahabis must be dealt with.”

These remarks were made one day after Abbasali Soleimani, the supreme leader’s representative in the Sistan and Baluchistan province lamented the “lack of security” for the Shia community in the region, saying, “If security exists, it must exist for all, and if it is absent, it must be absent for all.”

http://www.roozonline.com/english/news/newsitem/article/2009/june/02//unrest-mounts-in-zahedan.html

Sunnah – Rafidah (Shia) clashes in Iran!

Iran (as usual)  Blaming the West for Sunni Unrest

Reuters

* Violence erupts few days after bombing – state tv

* Unrest takes place as Iran prepares for election

* Five reportedly die in arson attack on building

(Adds detail, background)

TEHRAN, June 1 (Reuters) – Five people died and dozens were wounded during unrest in Iran’s southeastern city of Zahedan following a bombing of a Shi’ite mosque [Hussayniyyah Temple] that killed 25 people there last week, Iranian television reported on Monday.

Clashes between backers and opponents of a Sunni cleric in the city erupted less than two weeks before the officially Shi’ite Muslim country holds an election in which conservative President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad faces a challenge from reformers.

The deputy commander of Iran’s security forces, Brigadier General Ahmad Reza Radan, said a number of people planning to sow sectarian discord were arrested and that order had been restored in Zahedan, where many of Iran’s minority Sunnis live.

Officials have blamed both Thursday’s mosque bombing in Zahedan and a separate incident where a bomb was found on a plane two days later on Iran’s Western foes, with one saying they wanted to “create a security-threat environment” ahead of the June 12 presidential election.

Ahmadinejad, who often rails against Iran’s western enemies, runs against moderate opponents advocating detente in the Islamic Republic’s international relations in the vote.

Sectarian violence is relatively rare in Iran, whose leaders reject allegations by Western rights groups that the country discriminates against ethnic and religious minorities.

The five people who died in the unrest that broke out in Zahedan on Sunday were victims of an arson attack on a financial and credit institute building in the city of about 600,000 people, Iran’s Press TV said.

Dozens of civilians were reportedly also wounded in clashes fuelled by rumours a senior Sunni cleric had been assassinated, the English-language television station reported.

“ROGUE ELEMENTS”

Zahedan is the capital of Sistan-Baluchestan province, home to the Islamic Republic’s mostly Sunni ethnic Baluchis.

Close to the borders of both Pakistan and Afghanistan, the region is scene of frequent clashes between security forces and heavily armed drug smugglers and bandits.

On Thursday, the bombing of a popular Shi’ite mosque in Zahedan killed 25 people and wounded more than 120.

Three men convicted of involvement in the bombing, the deadliest such incident in Iran since its 1980-88 war with Iraq, were executed in public in Zahedan on Saturday.

A Sunni opposition group named Jundollah (God’s Soldiers), which Iran says is part of the Islamist al Qaeda network and backed by the United States, said it was behind the mosque bombing, Saudi-owned Al Arabiya television reported on Friday.

Iran has previously accused the United States, its arch-foe, of supporting Sunni rebels operating on its border with Pakistan. Jundollah says it fights for the rights of Iran’s minority Sunni population.

Iran’s Interior Ministry declined to comment on Monday’s Press TV report, which Iranian-language media did not carry.

Press TV said violence erupted after some people objected to Sunni prayer leader Molavi Abdolhamid attending Sunday’s commemoration ceremony for those who died in the mosque blast.

Sunnis also took to the streets in response to rumours he had been assassinated, “prompting rogue elements to attack and vandalize a number of public places,” it said on its Web site.

It carried footage showing a heavy presence of riot police and what appeared to be a burning car on a street. (Writing by Fredrik Dahl; Editing by Jon Hemming)

http://uk.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUKDAH145824

Important note: The Sunni Iranian resistance group of Jundullah made it clear on their website that the main target of the bombing were the  armed forces of the Rafidi-Safawi regime of Iran, i.e. the Basij and the Revolutionary Guards who used to gather largely in that Shia “Mosque”. Jundallah (Soldiers of Allah) (also known as Iranian People’s Resistance Movement) is an insurgent Sunni Islamic organization based in Balochistan which is fighting for the rights of Sunni Muslims in Iran. It is believed to have 1,000 fighters and claims to have killed 400 Iranian soldiers.

Message of the Sunnah Iranian Shaykh Abu Muntasir to the Ummah!

The Magicians in Iran (Rafidah Shia) – Shaykh Abu Muntasir al-Balushi [Video]

Here is the complete video of the The Magicians in Iran Seminar in London/UK, for all those who couldn’t attend. Inlcuding Abu Muntasir Al-Balushi/Dr Mollazadeh, the Iranian Sunni Shaykh of the “Iranian Sunni League of London”

Watch it on www.flagoftawheed.com!

Morocco severs relations with Iran

Morocco severs relations with Iran

The foreign ministry equated proselytising with challenging Morocco’s monarchy [AP] Morocco has severed diplomatic relations with Iran, accusing the Iranian diplomatic mission in Rabat of seeking to spread Shia Islam in the predominantly Sunni Muslim kingdom. A statement from Morocco’s foreign ministry on Friday accused the Iranian embassy of “intolerable interference in the internal affairs of the kingdom”, and of engaging in activities which threatened the religious unity of the country. “The Kingdom of Morocco has decided to break its diplomatic relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran beginning this Friday,” the ministry said. Monouchehr Mottaki, Iran’s foreign minister, said Morocco’s decision was unexpected. “The action by the Morocco government is surprising and questionable,” Mottaki told reporters. Bahrain controversy Moroccan local media has repeatedly accused Iran of proselytising in recent years, claims rejected by the Iranian ambassador. The controversy was fuelled recently by comments attributed to an adviser of Iran’s supreme leader which questioned the sovereignty of Bahrain, a Gulf Arab state which has a majority Shia population but is ruled by Sunnis. Morocco, however, has no official Shia population, with 99 per cent of the country being Sunni Muslim, and the rest either Jews or Christians. Sunni scholars in Morocco have denounced what they say is an effort to convert people to Shia Islam, arguing that such a practice could ultimately lead to sectarian strife similar to that witnessed in Iraq after the US-led invasion in 2003. Furthermore, as Mohamed VI, Morocco’s king, is the country’s official religious leader, any attempt to convert Sunni Muslims has been equated to an attack on the monarchy, the foreign ministry said. Morocco and Iran have had rocky ties since the Iranian revolution in 1979. The two normalised relations only in the late 1990s. source: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2009/03/2009370303221419.html Dr Mollazadeh (Shaykh Abi Muntasir Al-Balushy) already warned the Muslims of the threat of the Rafidhi Safawi regime of Iran:

A Rafidi Shia infidel dies in the US Army “Death to America ?!”

These are images of a Rafidi Shi’i who joined the US Army and was killed on  20.10.2008 by an IED in Afghanistan.

This is the ultimate end of those who fight the helpers of Allah’s cause.

“The hypocrites will be in the lowest depths of the Fire.” (4:145)

رافضي آمريكائي (اصليتش پاكستاني) در افغانستان هلاك شد !

هذا هو دأب الروافض قاتلهم الله

“Hujjatul-Islam” Hashem Reda (Imam of the New Yorker Fatimah Mosque), of the ‘blessed’ Rafidah Hawzahs of Qom/Najaf prays the Janazah for his fellow Majoosi

مرگ بر آمريكا ؟؟! Death to America ??!

فإلى جهنم وبئس المصير

Absolutely, the party of the devil are the loosers ألا إن حزب الشيطان هم الخاسرون

إن حزب الشيطان هم الخاسرون

Absolutely, the party of the devil (HizBush-Shiatan) are the loosers.

حزب الشیطان یک گروه نادان و جاهل و نا فهم و بی شعور و خونخوار و آدمکش ! پرورش یافتگان انگلیس ، نگهبان چاه جمکران و مواظب خروج امام زمان از غار با قرانی جدید و دینی من در آوردی!

به ظاهر خود را مدافع اسلام و قران و در حقیقت بزرگترین خائنان به اسلام و مسلمانان که تاریخشان مملو از تجاوز به مردم و ستم بر ملت ایران است،

رهبر حزب الشیطان آخوندی بی سواد و روضه خوان بنام خمینی بود  که با فریب دادن مردم بر اریکه قدرت نشست و بر نزدیکترینهایش رحم نکرد و همه را به دیدار قبل از میعاد امام از غار بیرون شده اش فرستاد .

این آخوند جیره خوار انگلیس به ظاهر با امریکا خود را مخالف قلمداد نمود تا انقلاب پلید و حیوان گونه اش را به جهانیان صادر نماید و بدبختیهائی را که مردم بیچاره ایران کشیده اند دیگران حسرتش را نخورند و خمینی مکار مدال افتخار مسئول باغ وحش جهانی را به گردنش بیاویزد تا پاداش بسیار بزرگی از غارنشین دریافت نماید

از اعضای این گروه آخوند شیره ای خامنه ای یکدست و رفسنجانی دزد بی ریش که متاسفانه دیگر دزدان به ریش خود پری دارند و این یکی چون ریش ندارد پری هم ندارد و لنکرانی و منکرانی و بزچرانی و گاوچرانی ولش کن هرچه اخرش ائی همراه باشه.

کلمات مورد استفاده : مرگ بر آمریکا ، مرگ بر روسیه نه ببخشید زنده باد روسیه ،ملت ایران وحشی هستند باید بهشان روش زندگی را یاد داد ، حزب الشیطان از اصحاب و اهلبیت پیامبر برترند ،استکبار جهانی در هر جنایت ما دست دارد ،هر مخالف ما ایادی بیگانه است چون وحی بر ما در هنگام صیغه کردن دختران بسیجی نازل می شود و….

حکایت: زوالشان نزدیک و بنیانشان لرزان و به زودی همه به ملاقات امام شیطانشان به اسفل السافلین خواهند رفت.

بشتابید : مردم که درب اسفل السافلین بسته می شود و به دیدار آخوند روضه خوانتان نمی رسید و حسرت روضه هایش را می خورید

شعر خطاب به خمینی:

ای که همه مکر و فریب بودی

شکر خدا که زود به جهنم رسیدی

خمینی شیطان جنایت  کم کرده بودی

که پیروانی بعد از مرگت تنیدی

Irani Sunnah Shaykh Kheyrshahi about Omar Faroogh (ra) سخنرانی خیرشاهی در مورد حضرت عمر فاروق

دانلود

<<<

من سنی هستم سنی عمری ….. عمر رضی الله تعالی عنه می خوام همه اونایی که اومدن زر مفت زدن

بفهمن….همشون

عمر کسی بوده که کافرا با شنیدن اسمش زانوهاشون

سست شده….

اونایی که به عمر چیزی بگن از کافر هم پست ترن

دست راست محمد رسول الله عمر هستش.عمر کسی است که قیصر وکسری با شنیدن نام او ارزه بر اندام می شدند.

اری عمر عادل ترین خلیفه بر روی زمین بود.

عمر مغز تاکتیک های جنگی زمان

عمر آن شیر مرد اسلام اه با نابودی زرتشت دین اسلام را به ما عرضه داشت

نمی دانم از کدام رشادهایت بگویم ای امیر المومنین

در یک کلام می گویم عزیز ترین چیزم یعنی جانم فدایت عمرجان

اینم بدونن که حضرت عایشه “رضی الله عنها” زنی پاک و

مقدس بوده وتوهین به عایشه انکار آیات قران است ومنکر قران کافر مطلق است قران می گوید عایشه رضی الله عنها زنی پاک ومبرااست و

عایشه مادر مومنان است

پس یک نصیحت این حدیث رسو ل الله(ص) رابشنوید که فرمودند:”لعن الله من سب اصحابی”

لعنت خدا بر کسانی که به یاران من فحش ودشنام میدهند.

وحرف اخر ای مشرکین وبدبخت ها شما با این کارها محب علی می شویدویا دارید خودتان را مسخره می کنید.توبه کنید وبه پاک ترین انسانهای روی زمین تهنت نزنید.

فداک امی وابی عایشه رضی الله عنها

حنظله

Iranian Sunni group Jundullah wants to enter political life

Iranian-Balochi Sunni group Jundollah wants to enter political life

“If we were allowed to practice our rights in full, we are willing to drop weapons and enter political life,” he said in an interview with the Saudi-owned station

The leader of an Iranian Sunni Muslim group said on Thursday his faction was willing to talk to the government of the Shi’ite-dominated country and turn itself into a political party.

Abdolmalek Rigi told Al Arabiya television that Jundollah (God’s Soldiers) was ready to open dialogue with the Iranian government “in the presence of an international institution.”

“If we were allowed to practice our rights in full, we are willing to drop weapons and enter political life,” he said in an interview with the Saudi-owned station.

Rigi also said Jundollah, which has killed at least four of 16 Iranian policemen it had abducted, was thinking of expanding its operations to defend the rights of Sunni Muslims in Iran, even into Tehran.

The rebels operate mostly in a region near the border with Pakistan. Sistan-Baluchestan, a region near Pakistan, is home to Iran’s mostly Sunni Muslim ethnic Baluchis.

Iran, which has often accused the United States and Britain of trying to destabilise the country by supporting rebels, has previously linked Jundollah to al Qaeda.

In 2007, Jundollah claimed responsibility for an attack on a bus carrying Iranian Revolutionary Guards that killed 11 people.

Reuters

آيت الشيطان خميني لعنه الله به روایت تصویر Ayatush-Shaytan Khomeini (l.a) in pictures

اهل سنت ايران تحت بي سابقه‌ترين فشارها

به طرز باورنكردني‌اي نسبت به‌همه‌ي سال‌هاي گذشته در ماه رمضان كه ماه مهماني خدا و ملاطفت و ‏مهرباني براي مسلمانان به شمار مي‌رود اقليت مذهبي مسلمان سني تحت بي سابقه‌ترين فشارهاي عقيدتي، ‏رواني، تبليغاتي و حتی جاني و مالي از سوي تندرو‌هاي مذهبي شيعه قرار گرفتند و دولت هم

هيچ‌گونه اقدامي ‏براي امنيت جاني و حيثيتي و عقيدتي اين گروه از شهروندان خويش انجام نداد و تا به امروز هم در سكوت به ‏سر برده است. دامنه‌ي اين فشارها تا جايي ادامه پيدا كرد كه مولوي عبدالحميد اعلام كرد كه “اگر اين ‏برخوردها و فشارها ادامه داشته‌باشد مردم اهل سنت در باره‌ي شركت در انتخابات رياست جمهوري آينده ‏تجديد نظر خواهند كرد و امكان آن وجود دارد كه حتی در انتخابات شركت نكنند”.‏

اما اين اتفاقات از چه زماني و با چه ويژگي‌هايي روي داده‌است كه داد اعتراض سني‌ها تا اين سطح بالا ‏آمده‌است؟ نوشتار زير اشاره به برخي از اتفاقاتي است كه در اين مدت بر سني‌ها در ايران رفته است.‏

اگر چه سني‌ها در قوانين جمهوري اسلامي مذهب‌شان به رسميت شناخته نمي‌شود و از حق انتخاب شدن براي ‏رياست جمهوري برخوردار نيستند و به طور عرفي در ۳۰سال گذشته اگرچه محدوديت قانوني وجود نداشته ‏اما هرگز هيچ فرد سني مذهبي به مقام وزارت هم نرسيده، اما به طور كلي در قانون اساسي قرار بر اين است ‏كه آنان مورد احترام و در انجام امور مذهبي خود آزاد باشند زيرا كه در اصل دوازدهم قانون اساسي ‏جمهوري اسلامي ايران “دين رسمي ايران اسلام و مذهب جعفري اثني عشري است” و ضمن لايتغير اعلام ‏كردن اين امر براي ابد مقرر مي‌دارد كه “مذاهب ديگر اسلامي اعم از حنفي، شافعي‌، مالكي، حنبلي زيدي ‏داراي احترام كامل مي‌باشند و پيروان اين مذاهب در انجام مراسم مذهبي، طبق فقه خودشان آزادند”.‏

از سوي ديگر و در اصل يازدهم همين قانون “دولت جمهوري اسلامي ايران موظف است سياسيت كلي خود ‏را بر پايه ي ائتلاف و اتحاد اسلامي قرار دهد و كوشش پيگير به عمل آورد تا وحدت سياسي، اقتصادي و ‏فرهنگي (نه تنها در عرصه‌ي داخلي بلكه) جهان اسلام را تحقق بخشد”.‏

اما با اين همه اتفاقاتي كه طي كمتر از دو ماه اخير در برخورد با سني‌ها روي داده نشان از نوعي تندروي ‏بي سابقه و فشارهايي بي‌واهمه مي‌دهد.اگر چه اين اقدامات هيچ‌كدام از سوي دولت يا نهادهاي دولتي رخ نداده ‏است اما مصون ماندن عاملان و عدم پي‌گيري‌هاي قضايي و امنيتي نسبت به مواردي كه در زير به‌ آن‌ها ‏اشاره مي‌شود نشان مي‌دهد كه مرتكب‌شوندگان اين اعمال و فشار ها خود را مصون از هر گونه آسيبي ‏مي‌بينند براي همين است كه ظاهرا به اعمال‌شان بي محابا ادامه مي‌دهند.‏

شايد بتوان آغاز رسمي اين اتفاقات را از تخريب “مدرسه‌ي ديني امام ابوحنيفه عظيم‌‌آباد زابل” مورد بررسي ‏قرار داد؛ ظاهرا سال گذشته بازماندگان موسس اين مدرسه، به خاطر دعوا بر سر ارث و به باور اهالي منطقه ‏به تحريك برخي ارگان‌ها، اين مدرسه را مسلحانه تصرف و اساتيد و طلاب را از مدرسه اخراج نمودند. بعد‎ ‎از اين جريان، بنابر تقاضاي اهالي روستاي عظيم‌آباد که در نزديکي لوتک قرار‏‎ ‎دارد، مدرسه به آن‌جا منتقل ‏شد و در طول اين مدت محل سکونت طلاب خانه‌هاي قديمي‌اي‎ ‎که مردمِ محل آن‌ها را يا وقف مدرسه نموده و ‏يا موقتاً و به صورت امانت در اختيار طلاب‎ ‎قرار داده بودند، بود‎.‎اما همين وضعيت نيز ظاهرا براي برخي ‏قابل تحمل نبود تا اينکه بالاخره سحر‌گاه روز چهارشنبه ۶ شهريور ماه، نيرو‌هاي مسلح‏‎ ‎با استفاده از لودرها و ‏ماشين‌آلات سنگين، به اين مدرسه يورش بردند و کليه اتاق‌ها، حجره‌ها و کانکس‌هاي طلاب و نيز خانه‌هاي ‏امانتي مردم را با خاک يکسان و‏‎ ‎تعدادي از طلاب اين مدرسه را به مکان نامعلومي منتقل کردند.‏

پيش‌تر از آن و در اواسط مرداد ماه “مولانا احمد حفظه‌الله” از علماي برجسته‌ي اهل سنت بعد از اينکه توسط ‏دادگاه ويژه روحانيت به مشهد احضار شد به مکان نامعلومي انتقال‏‎ ‎يافت به گونه‌اي که هيچ خبري از وي در ‏دست نبود و اجازه ملاقات با هيچ‎ ‎کس را نداشت، بعد از يک ماه که در بازداشت بود، در اواسط شهريور ماه ‏از مشهد به تهران منتقل شد. علت احضار و بازداشت وي همچنان در هاله‌اي از ابهام‎ ‎قرار دارد.‏

هم‌چنين بعد از جريان تخريب مدرسه عده‌اي از بستگان مديريت مدرسه و نيز بعد از ظهر روز سه شنبه ‏‏۱۹\۶\۸۷ مولوي محمديوسف اسماعيل‌زهي يکي از اعضاي پايگاه‎ ‎اطلاع‌رساني اهل سنت ايران در مسير ‏منزل خودش توسط نيروهاي امنيتي دستگير و بازداشت‎ ‎شد‎.‎

از سوي ديگر در ماه رمضان يك سي دي كه به وسيله‌ي بلوتوث هم ميان موبايل‌ها در شهر‌هاي كردستان ‏پخش شده بود كه حاوي دو سخنراني يك روحاني شيعه بر منبر است كه شديدترين توهين‌ها و ركيك ترين ‏فحاشي‌ها راعليه معتقدان به مذهب سني به كار مي‌گيرد و ضمن آنكه همه‌ي كساني را هم كه منادي وحدت ‏ميان شيعه و سني هستند به تمسخر مي‌گيرد از دولت درخواست مي‌كند به سني‌ها شناسنامه ندهند تا مبادا ‏جمعيت قانوني‌شان افزايش يافته و فردا مدعي حقوق بيشتري شوند. پخش اين تصاوير ميان مردم موجي از ‏احساس تحقير و ناراحتي را به‌دنبال داشت و واكنش‌هايي را هم از سوي برخي ائمه ي جمعه شهرهاي ‏كردستان برانگيخت.‏

در اتفاقات ديگري در كم‌تر از يك هفته دو روحاني سني در مهاباد و پيران‌شهر به طرز مشكوكي(كه مردم ‏محلي اين مرگ‌ها را ترور عنوان كرده‌اند)به ضرب گلوله از پاي درآمدند. در واقع چند روز بعد از ترور ‏ابوبکر تينا؛ روحاني اهل سنت و امام جماعت يکي از مساجد مهاباد توسط افراد مسلح ناشناس، در حالي كه ‏تنها دو روز از عيد فطر گذشته بود، ابوبکر قادرياني يکي ديگر از روحانيون اهل سنت در شهرستان ‏پيران‌شهر نيز در مقابل منزل خود به ضرب گلوله از پاي درآمد. هم‌زمان منابع محلي کردستان از احضار ‏امام جماعت يکي از مساجد اهل سنت در شهرستان سردشت به وزارت اطلاعات اين شهرستان خبر دادند.به ‏نوشته اين منابع ابوبکر قادرياني از فعالين مذهبي بود که با مجوز مراجع صلاحيت دار به تدريس مسائل ‏مذهبي ويژه اهل سنت در اين شهرستان اشتغال داشت؛او پيش از اين چندين بار توسط دادگستري شهرستان ‏احضار شده بود. تاکنون هيچ شخص و يا گروهي مسئوليت ترور اين دو روحاني اهل سنت درکردستان را ‏برعهده نگرفته اگرچه دو روز بعد از ترور روحاني مهابادي يک منبع آگاه به نقل از فرمانداري اين شهر خبر ‏از دستگيري چهارتن به ظن دست داشتن درترور وي داد. اما پس از آن مقامات محلي و استاني در قبال اين ‏دو حادثه سکوت کامل اختيار کرده اند.‏

اما اين تنها اتفاقاتي نيست كه در مناطق سني نشين روي داده‌است زيرا همگان از تلاش ناكام مانده‌ي سني‌هاي ‏تهران در تمام اين سال‌ها براي احداث يك مسجد براي سني‌ها در تهران خبر دارند و در شهرهاي غير سني ‏نشين نيز ظاهرا اهل تسنن براي انجام فريضه ي نماز جماعت با مشكلاتي رو به رو هستند.‏

بنا به گزارش سايت سني آنلاين‎ ‎‏(پايگاه اطلاع‌رساني اهل سنت ايران) نماز جمعه روستاي ماد آباد واقع در ‏استان زنجان تعطيل شد. نماز جمعه اين روستا که مردم چندين روستاي اطراف نيز جهت اقامه نماز جمعه به ‏اين روستا مي آمدند، بعدازهجوم افراد مسلح به اين مسجد و تهديد نمازگزاران و مردم روستاي مذکور، تعطيل ‏شد.همچنين برخي ديگر از خبرها حاکي از اين است که در برخي از مناطق اهل سنت اين استان، روحانيوني ‏از اهل تشيع در بعضي از روستاها مستقر شده اند و به بيان مسايل عقيدتي- مذهبي خويش مي پردازند. بر ‏اساس برخي گزارش‌هاي محلي مردم اهل سنت اين مناطق مورد تهديد قرار گرفته و بالاجبار ملزم به شرکت ‏در جلسات و کلاس‌هاي درس اين روحانيون شده اند. اين در حالي است كه حدوددو ماه پيش تعدادي از فعالان ‏اهل سنت زنجان توسط اداره اطلاعات بازداشت شدند.دستگيري اين افراد که از نخبگان و فرهنگيان سرشناس ‏استان زنجان نيز به شمار مي آيند، پس از آن صورت گرفت که تعدادي از اين نمازگزاران اهل سنت در نظر ‏داشتند در يکي از منازل اين شهر نماز جماعت برگزار نمايند.‏

موج اين فشارها و تهديدات رواني و عملي باعث نگراني بسياري در ميان فعالان حقوق بشر و نيز مردم اهل ‏سنت در ايران شده است. اين‌ها در حالي است كه همان طور كه در بالا به نص قانون اساسي اشاره كردم ‏قاعدتا نبايست با اهل سنت چنين برخوردهايي صورت گيرد زيرا طبق قانون آن‌ها بايد احترام ببينند و در ‏مراسم مذهبي و انجام فرايض ديني خود آزاد باشند. از سوي ديگر يادمان نرود كه ما اگر هم به هيچ آيين و ‏مذهبي معتقد نباشيم اما وظيفه داريم كه در مقابل همه ي اشكال تبعيض قد علم كرده و مانع از آن بشويم كه ‏گروهي به دلايل جنسيتي، زباني، نژادي،

اقتصادي و قومي مورد تبعيض قرار بگيرند.‏

نوشتن اين مطلب از سوي نگارنده نه ربطي به اختلاف مذهبي بين شيعيان و سني‌ها دارد و نه جانب‌داري ‏ويژه و يا نقد هرگونه اعتقاد مذهبي، بلكه تنها سويه‌اي حقوق بشري دارد و نشان دادن گوشه‌اي از رنجي است ‏كه به برخي ديگر از شهروندان ايران به دلايل مذهبي مي‌رود.‏

شهاب الدين شيخي

shahabaddins@gmail.com

ببنید برادران من!
هر روز شما شاهد ترور جسمی و شخصیتی علمأ , دانشمندان , شخصیت های ملی, تخریت مساجد و مدارس و به دار آویختن تمامی های اقشار بی بضاعت ایران مظلوم هستید.
تا کی میخواهید به این وضع رقت بار ادامه دهید ؟
تا کی میخواهید شاهد اعدام ها و ترور های علمأ خود و تخریب مدارس و مساجد خود باشید؟ا
ای ملت بزرگوار ایران!
شما تا کی میخواهید شاهد چپاولگری های دولت آخندی علی شیره یی باشید و هر روز به بهانه های دینی خود ساخته آخندیزم مال شما را بنام خمس و ناموس بعضی از مردم بیچاره و نادان را بنام صیغه از شما بگیرند و شما تما شا کنید ؟
خداوند از سر تقصیرات همه ی ما درگذرد

ملت ایران بیدار شوید
بپا خیزید و دمار از روز گار آخندیزم صفوی در آورید.
عزت از آن الله و رسول الله و مؤمنین است

برادران من !
در مبارزات صدر اسلام, جنگی که حضرت خالد بن ولید رضی الله تعالی عنه با ایرانی ها و یا رومی ها داشت , تعداد شان ۶۰۰۰ مجاهد بود و در مقابل شان ۲۰۰۰۰۰ نیروی تا دندان مسلح کفر بودند.
حضرت عمر رضی الله تعالی عنه طی نامه یی برای حضرت خالد مینویسد و برایش یاد آور میشود که ای خالد , متوجه باش که من از نیروی زیادی دشمن هراسی ندارم و ترسم از این است که در میان نیروی مجاهدین گناهی از ایشان سر نزند و اگر مجاهدین مرتکب کدام گناهی شدند آنوقت نیروی زیاد بر نیروی کم و امکانات زیاد بر امکانات کم پیروز خواهد شد .
چرا که اگر از مجاهدین کدام گناهی سر زند وای بر حال شما و شما از توجه الله سبحانه و تعالی میآفتید.
و مثالی از برادران مجاهدم در عراق !

تعداد واقعی مجاهدین ما در عراق ۴۰۰۰ بیشتر نیستند و در مقابل شان ۱۶۰۰۰۰ نیروی صلیبی مجهز با مدرن ترین سلاح های روز و ۶۰۰۰۰ نیروی حلقه بگوش صلیبی که مجموعآ ۱۲۰۰۰۰ نیرو در مقابل مجاهدین اسلام قرار دارند
و توجه کنید که دشمن با تمام نیروی نظامی و ترفند های منافقانه مزدوران شان بر علیه مجاهدین و مسلمین ناکام مانده اند و روز بروز اجسام پلید خود را از سرزمین علی مرتضی , آرامگاه حسین رض, و آرامگاه حسن بصری , ابوحنیفه و دیگر شخصیت های اسلامی میبرند .

و در افغانستان هم خود تان ببینید که مجاهدین ما (امارت اسلامی افغانستان ) چه بحال عساکر صلیب و ناتو و غلامان حلقه بگوش شان میاورند. (به اذن الله تعالی)
در افغانستان جز مرکز چند شهر مشهور و قرار گاه های صلیبی که در کنترول شان هست دیگر در تمام کشور مجاهدین ما فعال هستند . به یاری الله متعال
و روز بروز حلقه بر صلیبی ها و مزدوران شان تنگ تر میشود (فقط به یاری الله سبحانه و تعالی)

برادران من بیدار شوید
عزت از آن الله و رسول الله و مؤمنین است.

.

جذاب ترين نمونه آرايش مو در ايران

جذاب ترين نمونه آرايش مو در ايران به خاطر عشقي كه ملت ايرا ن به احمي دارند ۸۰ درصد دانشجويان موهاي خود را به اين صورت در مي آورند

Iran’s war on Sunni Muslims

Tehran’s leaders are intensifying their repression of the Sunni Iranian people, in a bid to create a Shia-dominated nation

Comments ()

News is filtering out of Iran of mass arrests of Sunni Muslims living in the south-east of the country, in the region Balochistan. It signifies a coordinated crackdown against religious and ethnic dissidents who oppose Tehran’s clerical sectarianism and its neo-colonial subjugation of the Iranian Baloch people.

Iran’s repression, which has intensified since August, is targeting expressions of Baloch identity and culture; in particular expressions of religious freedom and national self-determination.

In contrast to the Shia Muslim regime in Tehran, the Baloch are predominantly Sunni Muslims. This combination of ethnic and religious dissidence has led to them being harshly victimised by successive Iranian leaders, from the Shah to President Ahmadinejad.

Tehran’s repression of the Baloch is well documented by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. It has also been reported by Radio Balochi FM and the Baloch People website. The recent crackdown is confirmed by officially-sanctioned Iranian news agencies.

In a March this year, Iranian parliament member Hossein Ali Shahryari stated that 700 people were awaiting execution in Sistan and Balochistan provinces, many of them Baloch political prisoners. This staggering number of death sentences is evidence of the intense, savage repression that is taking place.

As Sunni Muslims, the Iranian Baloch people experience marginalisation and discrimination within a country where Shia Islam is the official state religion and holds political power. They seek self-rule, either within a federal Iran or as an independent nation of Balochistan (together with the Baloch regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan).

On both counts, religious and ethnic, they are deemed enemies of the neo-colonialists in Tehran; hence the current wave of repression.

Reports from the left-wing Balochistan People’s Party and from Balochistan Human Rights Watch catalogue arrests, executions and widespread attacks on Sunni Muslim institutions.

Mulavi Ahmed Naroi, a high-ranking Sunni leader, was arrested on August 9 and is now incarcerated in a Tehran prison. He was member of the editorial board of Sunni Online, a religious website. Another member of the Sunni Online board, Mohammad Yousef Ismailzahi, was arrested on September 9.

The Abu Hanifa Mosque, a Sunni mosque and religious school in city of Zabol, was attacked and demolished, using bulldozers and tractors, on August 27. Many important, priceless editions of the Quran and historic Sunni religious books were destroyed. The mosque’s students and staff were also arrested. They have now completely disappeared. No one knows where they have been taken or what has been done to them. There are fears that they are being tortured or perhaps have been executed in secret.

Soon after the August 27 raid, there were mass raids in which relatives and friends of the arrested people were also arrested by Iranian intelligence agents.

In a blatant attempt at censorship and cover-up, the vice-deputy head of political and social affairs in Sistan and Balochistan, Mohammad Zadeh Farahani, denounced the videos and photos of the mosque’s destruction as false and fictitious. He warned that anyone who disseminates images of the destruction will be arrested and severely punished.

Last year, another mosque in the same district was ransacked and destroyed by associates of the Revolutionary Guards. The imam, Hafez Mohammad Ali Shahbkhsh, was arrested on October 27.

More recently, on 16 June this year, 33 military vehicles packed with Mersad agents (the special security force in Iran) attacked the village of Nasirabad. The aim of the attack was to arrest Moulavai Abed Bahramzahi, the local Sunni religious clerk. Armed officers assaulted protesting villagers; three of whom were seriously injured, hospitalised and later imprisoned.

Two Sunni religious workers were hanged in Zahedan jail in April after having confessed, under extreme torture, to resistance activities against the Iranian regime. Tehran accused them of supporting armed Sunni groups, but the evidence against them was purely circumstantial and the conduct of their trials was seriously flawed. They were humiliated in public and their confessions were broadcast on Iranian TV, in a deliberate attempt to intimidate all oppositionists. Three more Baloch rights campaigners were executed in Zahedan prison on August 24.

Early last month, four Baloch cultural workers, including a young poet, were arrested. Nothing has been heard them since, according to Balochistan Human Rights Watch.

Even young Baloch children are being targeted by the Iranian regime. Many have been arrested and jailed. Some have suffered severe beatings, which have left them with broken limbs. At least two youngsters have been murdered in violent assaults.

Much of this repression by Iranian government security agents has racist, anti-Baloch overtones, with the victims being insulted about their ethnicity and faith.

The BPP says the persecution of moderate Sunni clerics and religious students is an attempt by the Tehran regime to suppress non-fundamentalist believers and to strengthen the position of fanatical Shiism in the Baloch homeland. Since most Balochs are Sunni, attacks on the Sunni faith are also de facto attacks on the Baloch people and nation.

Iranian Sunni resistance leader: We want a government in Iran that guarantees equal rights for every citizen

We want a government in Iran that guarantees equal rights for every citizen

By Shahzada Zulfiqar

Abdul Malik Rigi, chief of Irans Sunni Jundallah group

It was six years ago that Abdul Malik Rigi alias Mulla Malik, an Iranian Sunni Baloch, and 30 others joined hands and formed an organisation called Jundallah. Before declaring war against the Iranian state, he sent a delegation of tribal notables to the Iranian government demanding equal rights as enjoyed by the Shia majority of the country for the Sunnis and the Baloch. Once the government refused to consider these demands, the Jundallah members took to the mountains and declared war to secure rights of the Sunnis and the Baloch living in Iran. Rigi now tops the Iranian governments most wanted list. Rigi says hundreds are willing to join Jundullah, whose current membership stands at 600. But, he says, the organisation cannot admit them all because it is run on small donations from the Iranian people and, therefore, it is not economically viable for it to have too many members. Rigis parents have also fled their home for fear of persecution and now live in the mountains along with other members of the militant leaders extended family. Rigi lives on the Iranian border with Pakistan but he and his men constantly carry out attacks inside Iranian territory. These attacks involve raids on the posts of border-security forces, killing or injuring security personnel, looting their arms and ammunitions and holding the officers hostage.

http://www.dawn.com

سلام بر دلاوران بلوچ, سلام بر شيران اهل سنت ايران زمين

Eidkum Mubaarak – Eidetaan Mobaarak baad

may Allah accept from us, and from you

Ramadaan Mobaarak ! رمضان مبارك باد

as-salaamu `alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu !

due to a journey of our staff, we couldn’t provide you with the latest news of your brethren of Ahl as-Sunnah of Iran. But more important than that, we couldn’t greet our dear readers and muslimoon worldwide !