
نقل فارسي
https://www.sunni-news.com/?p=3352
http://www.ayandenews.com/fa/pages/?cid=8898
We already reported about Ahmadinejad the Rafidi Shiite, the blooy Mushrik who slandered the Sahabah and uttered clear-cut Shirk. Under the reign of this follower of Khomeini (May Allah curse him) the Ahl Al-Sunnah of Iran suffered a suffering which they have never faced before since the begin of the paganistic Rafidi Khomeinistic Revolution. Yet only a few days before the 2009 presidency elections Iran the Rafidi-Safawi president of Iran, Ahmadinejad exposed again the real face of the hypocrite Shia-Rafidi state of Iran and the true beliefs of a proper Rafidi like himself. Live on Air, on the Shabaka 3 channel of the “Islamic” Republic of Iran this so called president of the “Islamic” state shamelessly accused two of the noble companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him, his household and his companions), namely Talhah and Zubayr of Apostasy!
Ahmadinejad said:
“طلحه وزبير از ياران پيغمبر بودند ولي بعد از پيغمبر منحرف گرديده وبه طرفداري از معاويه پرداختند”
“Talhah and Zubayr were of the Prophets companions, yet after his demise they became corrupted (turned their backs) and followed Muawiyah”
Source: Sunni-News of Iran
Ahmadinejad was trying to make a point by making a cheap, heretical comparison between the Companions of the Prophet (saws) and the politicians of today (linking it to his rival Mousavi) who first promise and fight for the people and later on turn their backs on them.
We don’t even need to mention how this retarted Mushrik billah is slandering more than 15 million Sunni Iranians and their beliefs, or to say the least the biggest religious minority of Iran, for this Rafidi is slandering the beliefs of 90% of the Muslims worldwide, yet there are still some individuals out there who support and chant for this Rafidi state and a Sahabah hating Rafidi like Ahmadinejad for they (those who chant) are either unaware of the beliefs of Shiism and a Rafidi like Ahmadinjad who is a twelver Rafidi, or they don’t want to understand that this regime and every Rafidi who is upon the Religion of twelver Shiism is an open enemy to the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them).
Important note:
Ahmadinejad said on air on Iranian state television:
‘Talhah and Zubayr were of the Prophets companions, yet after his demise they became corrupted (turned their backs) and followes Muawiyah’
Subhanallah (Glory be to Allah)! who exposes the sharlatans and enemies of the Prophets companions at their very own hands! This statement of Ahmadinejad is a complete refutation of himself. All his credibility (if he ever had any anyway) are gone, for he uttered his complete ignorance of Islamic History. Talhah and Zubayr, the two noble companions of the Prophet (saws) never fought with Muawiyah for they died long time before in the battle of Jamal in the Islamic year of 36 whereas Muawiyah became King in 41, thus Talhah and Zubay never joined Muawiyah for they were already dead!
We ask Allah the almighty to eradicate this regime of Shirk and Rafd and may Allah help the Ahl Al-Sunnah of Iran to get rid of theoffspring of the Safawid Rafidites! Ameen!
Ahmadinjad the Rafidi who expressed nothing but the basic bliefs of twelver Shiism, as declared ages before him by Khomeini the accursed one and co.!
This accursed Rafidi, expressed the basic belief of twelver Rafidi Shiism, namely that almost all of the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him, his household and his companions) turned Apostates after his demise, except a hanfull! This is not his personal view, neither is he an “extreme” twelver Shiite, nay! the reality is he is declaring nothing but the basic beliefs of the Religion of twelver Shiism (Al-Rafidah), as been declared by their most important books and sayings of their giant scholars:

Marked Part:
Abi Ja’far (“infallible” Imam of the Shia) said,’ The people apostated after the demise of the Prophet (saws) except of three.’ We asked him who are they ? He said:” Al-Miqdad, Abu Tharr and Salman Al-Farsi.
If all of that were mentioned in ONE book and by ONE scholar we would have accepted it to be weak in Rafidah Religion.
Let us make a list of some SHIA SCHOLARS who say that all sahaba turned apostate except few.
Kulaini
Al-Kashi
Ali Bin Ibrahim Al-Qummi
Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi
Now lets see how many ahadeeths speak the same.
All Sahabah companions except 3 left Islaam after demise of Nabi.
Anwaar – No’maan Niyyah – P245. Vol 2. Nimatullah Jafaari./ Furu Kafi, Kitaabul Raudah :115 – Mullah Muhammad bin Yaqoob Kulaini Vol 3 P115/ Usul -e-Kafi Vol 2, P 246 Rijaal Kashi P. 504.
Sahabahbecame infidel by denying the divine right (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali. First three caliph and other Sahabas became infidel by denying the divine right of (Wilayat) of Hazrat Ali. (Usool Kaafi, Page No. 420)
All the people rejected Islam after the death of the Prophet except three. Miqdad, Abu Zar and Salman Farsi. (Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 134)
The Munafiqeen (i.e. Sahaba) took very much out of Quran (took out the verses).” (Ihtijaj at Tabrasi, page #382).
There was no sahabi who believed in the Rafidi fairy-tale of Ali being infallible Imam (not even Ibn Abbas from the Ahl Al-Bayt!), which means all are apostates.
What is the truth about Talhah and Zubayr?
Talha ibn Ubayd-Allah and Zubair ibn al-Awam were one of the two companions, whom the Prophet (saws) promised the Paradise.
Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Akhnas said that when he was in the mosque, a man abused Ali (RA). So Saeed bin Zayd got up and said: “I bear witness to the Apostle of Allah (SAWS) that I heard him say: “Ten persons will go to Paradise: “Abu Bakr will go to Paradise, Umar will go to Paradise, Uthman will go to Paradise, Ali will go to Paradise, Talha will go to Paradise: Zubair bin Al-Awwam will go to Paradise, Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas will go to Paradise and Abdur-Rahman bin Awf will go to Paradise. If I wish, I can mention the tenth.” The People asked: “Who is he?” so he kept silence. They again asked: “Who is he?” He replied: “He is Saeed ibn Zayd.” He then said: “The company of one man whose face has been covered with dust by the Apostle of Allah (SAWS) is better than the actions of one of you for a whole life time even if he is granted the life-span of Noah.” [Abu Dawud]
These Ten Companions are listed below, together with the dates of when they lived and died:
1. Abu Bakr As-Siddiq (51 B.H-13 A.H; 573-634 C.E)
2. Umar bin Al-Khattab Al-Farooq (40 B.H-23 A.H; 584-644 C.E)
3. Uthman bin Affan Ghani Dhun-Nurayn (47 B.H- 35 A.H; 577-656 C.E)
4. Ali bin Abi Talib (23 B.H- 40 A.H; 600-661 C.E)
5. Talha bin Ubaidullah (28 B.H-36 A.H; 596-656 C.E)
6. Zubair bin Al-Awwaam (28 B.H-36 A.H; 596-656 C.E)
7. Abdur-Rahman bin Awf (passed away 31 A.H/654 C.E)
8. Sa’d bin Abi Waqqas (23 B.H-55 A.H; 600-675 C.E)
9. Saeed bin Zaid (passed away 51 A.H)
10.Abu Ubaidah Aamir bin Abdullah bin Al-Jarrah.
In the battle of Jamal, the Hypocritesand rebels from both sides (Alis and Aishas) started the battle well known Jamal battle on both sides, yet Zubair was unwilling to fight against Ali and left the battlefield. It is said that during the battle Ali called Zubair and recalled him the saying of Prophet Mohammad that:
| “ |
You will one day fight against Ali, over an unjust cause |
”
|
Recalling this saying of Prophet Mohammad (saws), Zubair left the battlefield and was killed during prayers by one of the soldier of Ali’s army who was chasing him. On hearing the news of Zubair’s assasination, Ali is reported to have said to the killer of Zubair:
So let us, the Ahl Al-Sunnah, the real followers of Ahl Al-Bayt (i.e. Ali) say the same to the enemy of Zubayr in this age:
‘May you burn in hell Ahmadinejad!
For even Shia sources approve the love of Ali (ra) towards his brothers Al-Zubayr and Talhah:
Amir Al-Mu’mineen Ali even mourned for Talhah and Zubayr when they were killed.
“Both Talha and Zubayr fell, and Imam `Ali magnanimously mourned the fallen and had them honourably buried”
Source: Shiite website of the Iranian regime
Rafidah Shias are indeed pathetic. The way they define a righteous is by comparing it to infallibility. This is a status only restricted to Prophets. Talha (ra) and Zubair (ra) were great Companions. Even Imam Ali (ra) acknowledged this in their funerals. He also pointed out the sacrifices that they made from Islam. The reality is when it comes to the status of the Sahabah the Rafidah Shais judge them like the Khawarij judge the Muslims.
This is the balanced Sunnah view.
قال العلامة الفاخوري رحمه الله في كتابه تحفة الأنام في تاريخ الاسلام ص67:
“على أن معشر اهل الحق من اهل السنة والجماعة يعتقدون أن معاوية كان مخطئاً، بغى على الإمام الحق علي بن أبي طالب لسبق البيعة والخلافة له رضي الله عنه، وهو مصيب بمحاربة معاوية وأصحابه بحكم قتال أهل البغي من المسلمين، ولذا لم يعاملهم معاملة المرتدين ولاالكافرين، وأن عائشة وطلحة والزبير رضي الله عنهم قد رجعوا عن خطئهم بخروجهم في وقعة الجمل على أمير المؤمنين، وقد ندموا على خروجهم متأسفين، والندم توبة من الخطيئة، فاتبع الحق ولاتتبع الهوى فيضلك عن سبيل الله والله أعلم”. اهـ.
- Allama Al-Fakhouri, the grand Shafi’iy Mufti of Beirut ( rahmatullahi alayhi) said in his book “ Tarikh al-islam” ( History of Islam), page 67:
“ The people of righteousness ( Ahlul Haqq) of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jam’a believe that Mu’awiyah was mistaken, transgressed on the righteous Khalifah Ali bin Abi Taleb. As he had the Bay’ah and Khilafah, radiya’Allahu anhu. And that he –Ali- is righteous in fighting Mu’awiyah and his companions based on the rules of Transgressors of Muslims, hence, he did not treat them as Kuffar (blasphemers) nor rejectors. And that Aisha, Talha and Zubair, radiya’Allahu anhum, all repented for their mistake to go to the battle of Jamal, and they regretted it sorrowfully. Regret is a sign of –sincere- repentance, so follow the truth not your desires, otherwise you will deviate from the path of Allah, and Allah knows best”.
Aishah (ra), Talhah (ra) and Zubair (ra) repented after they transgressed. There is a verse in the Quran which asks for sinners to be forgiven.
40:7. Those (angels) who bear the Throne (of Allah) and those around it glorify the praises of their Lord, and believe in Him, and ask forgiveness for those who believe (in the Oneness of Allah) (saying): “Our Lord! You comprehend all things in mercy and knowledge, so forgive those who repent and follow Your Way, and save them from the torment of the blazing Fire! (al Quran)
But Of course we know that Ali is the demigod of the Rafidah Shias so insulting or even cursing him makes one obviously an Infidel/Fasiq/Fajir.
Rawafid you usually bring up a Ahadith ‘..no one but a believer would love you (Ali)…’ that is mentioned in Sahih Muslim. But what about the Ansar and Muhajireen ?And since Rawafid are ignorants of Sunni narrations, they fail to notice the five Ahadith that preceed the “loving Ali” Ahadith, and they are…
1- It is reported on the authority of Anas that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and blessings Be upon him) observed: The sign of a hypocrite is the hatred against the Ansar and the sign of a believer is the love for the Ansar.
2- It is narrated on the authority of Anas that the Apostle (may peace and blessings be upon him) said: The love of the Ansar is the sign of faith and hatred against them is the sign of dissemblance.
3- Al-Bara reported it from the Apostle (may peace and blessing be upon him) that he observed with regard to the Ansar, None but the believer loves them, none but the hypocrite hates them. He who loved them loved Allah and he who hated them hated Allah. I (the narrator) said: Did you hear this hadith from al-Bara’? He said: To me, he narrated it.
4- It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and blessings be upon him) said: A person who believes in Allah and the Last Day never nurses a grudge against the Ansar.
5- It is narrated on the authority of Abu Sa’id Khudri that the Messenger of Allah observed: The person who believes in Allah and the Last Day never nurses a grudge against the Ansar.
So if we were to follow Rafidi illogic, then we shall reach to the conculsion that Ali (ra) was a hypocrite, since he fought against an army that had Ansar in it.
But Alhamdullillah we are not from the Rafidah to jump to stupid conculsions. The fact is that the war/insults etc did not take place due to hatred of one another, but due to dispute in the matter of Qisas for Othmans (ra) blood.
Allah (swt) said: If two parties of believers fall into a quarrel, make ye peace between them.
Allah didn’t called one party to be hypocrite or Kuffar but addressed them but as believers. And then He (swt) said: “Indeed the believers are but Brothers. Therefore reconcile the differences between your brothers,
Even the most sacred Rafidi Book (Nahj Al Balagha) (fabricated book according to us) contain such statmen (Namely that Muawiya and co. were considered as brother in faith by Ali):
The thing began in this way: We and the Syrians were facing each other while we had common faith in one Allah, in the same Prophet (s) and on the same principles and canons of religion. So far as faith in Allah and the Holy Prophet (s) was concerned we never wanted them (the Syrians) to believe in anything over and above or other than what they were believing in and they did not want us to change our faith. Both of us were united on these principles. The point of contention between us was the question of the murder of Uthman. It had created the split. They wanted to lay the murder at my door while I am actually innocent of it.
source: Rafidi website al-islam.org
Here you go… Clear proof that doesn’t need explaination, however I will walk you through it…
A) We and the Syrians were facing each other while we had common faith in one Allah
from this part we can conclude that the Syrians who pledged allegiance to muawiya (and headed by Muawiya) had faith in ALLAH!
B) …in the same Prophet
the Syrians who pledged allegiance to Muawiya (which include muawiya r.a. and were headed by muawiya ) BELIEVED in MUHAMMAD as the messenger of Allah and from amongst them was Moghaira Ibnu Shu3ba!.
and to blast the Rawafid away : In Sunan Bayhiqi it is narrated that on the eve of the war of Jamal, Ali Radhi
Allaahu ta’ala ‘anh was asked about the opponents (Talha and Zubayr etc.):
“Are they Mushrikeen?” He replied:
“They have run from shirk and come into Islaam”
Then he was asked “Are they Munafiqeen?”
He replied “Munafiqeen are those who don’t remember Allah, except a little
(while the opponents do a lot of Zikr)”
Then he was asked “Then what are they?” He replied:”They are our brothers who
have rebelled from us”
[Sunun Bayhiqi - Dairat ul Ma'arif edition page 173 vol 8]
____________________________________________
Click here for more authentic information about the dispute between the great companions of the Prophet (saws)
Ali and Zubayr and Talha and co. at the battle of Jamal.
and here!